Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg

File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2018 at 21:00:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 09-20 PAN HDR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info Interior view of the nave of the church of St Felix, Torralba de Ribota, province of Zaragoza, Spain. The church, of mudéjar and late gothic style was built between 1367 and 1420. The church is a national heritage monument in Spain (known as Bien de Interés Cultural) since 2006 and it didn't have a free license image until now. Poco² 21:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 21:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Distracting corner at the bottom left -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

  What do you mean? :) Now seriously, I don't think that was a major issue to oppose but still, gone, --Poco² 19:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Neutral after correction. Yes, this dark corner was very intrusive. So please, Poco, understand why I opposed here your picture, instead of contesting the issue you've just fixed. We certainly see things differently. You find this image awesome, while I just consider it very ordinary, with honesty and good faith. We have tons of similar pictures of religious buildings here (mainly christian, not much other religions represented) and this one is just one more. Due to the distorted perspective, this church looks giant inside, while the reality is probably very different. I personally prefer non-deformed perspective because it gives a better idea of how the interior is in truth. The color is yellowish, so not very aesthetic. In these conditions, an intrusive object spoiling the left corner to completely break the symmetry was just too much. This is only my subjective opinion, and your photo also gets 5 supports. Now I'm neutral because the correction was made successfully -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)