Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karersee HDR.jpg

File:Karersee HDR.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2009 at 20:21:31

•  Info created by afrank99 - uploaded by afrank99 - nominated by afrank99 -- Afrank99 (talk) 20:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Afrank99 (talk) 20:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Tired time (talk) 09:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Zuffe (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, and why exactly was HDR necessary for this picture? Rather unsharp, and a bland composition. --Aqwis (talk) 09:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Because there is too much contrast (dark trees - light mountain and sky) to be captured in one single exposure. I can easily reduce resolution to 2 MPixels to make it sharp, if you want me to. --Afrank99 (talk) 10:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment The guidelines is against reducing resolution. /Daniel78 (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
      •  Comment sure, but it doesn't make sense to complain about poor pixel-level sharpness when there is plenty of image resolution. --Afrank99 (talk) 07:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
      • This guideline is bullshit. --LC-de (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like it --kaʁstn 11:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very impressive but bad quality at the edges -- Ukuthenga (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The technical flaws kill it for me. Distortions, unsharpness and due to the HDR processing the sky has an unnatural and weird brightness gradient. --LC-de (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral En principe, a great image, but the unsharpness is just unpleasant. Booksworm (talk) 17:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as LC-de. Lycaon (talk) 21:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose LC-de said it better than I could. Maedin\^talk 11:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)