Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 15.jpg
File:Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 15.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2018 at 08:17:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Support - Very inviting. I'd like to be one of the tourists walking into town. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment I'd like them to be out of the picture. Charles (talk) 13:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Nice castle, but IMO not special enough. I don't like the shadows and the cut-off tower. Btw, there are dust spots --A.Savin 14:11, 6 November 2018 (UTC)- Oppose Tourists in pictures generally don't work in my view, unless these people play a role in the image, are in a way or another captivating, bringing something special. So here I just see a tourist shot and the walls look much less spectacular presented in this context -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:30, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not as a rule opposed to tourists in pictures of (gasp!) tourist attractions, but in this case they are a distraction. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Alternative version[edit]
File:Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 04.jpg
- Info All by --Tournasol7. Maybe this version is better? Tournasol7 (talk) 18:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment This is not an alternative version but a significantly different image that shouldn't be nominated under the first one but rather as standalone --Poco2 20:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Yep, per Poco. If you whish to put this photo up for nomination, you must do that separately. You already have another active nom so you need to withdraw this (the original) one if you want to go with the new photo. --Cart (talk) 20:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Ok, thank you for your comments :) Tournasol7 (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
*
Oppose The center of the composition, wherer eyes are focusing, should contain a subject. Here the center is a big emtpy hole. too bad the 2 lateral buildings dont look enough interesting (nbad lighting) to be enough to substain the whole composition which looks untidiy and not enough balanced. That bunch of people walking are distracting ad they add nothing to the story the image should tell: they have unpleasant poses and are poorly dressed. The photographer might go back to the scene in a different hour of the day (all the left part of the image is in a shade), wait for people to disappear and try another angle. All IMO.Paolobon140 (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Info Striked. Vote added after nom was withdrawn. --Cart (talk) 16:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
