Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1612.jpg

File:15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1612.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2018 at 21:16:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1612.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-07-05-Schloß-Caputh-RalfR-N3S 1612.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info Fliesensaal im Schloß Caputh, all by -- Ralf Roleček 21:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ralf Roleček 21:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - PumpkinSky talk 21:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The tiles are too soft, especially those on the floor. Compare to this file, all looks more detailed and natural. Probably overHDR'ed / overNR'ed. Some chromatic aberrations at the top, too. --A.Savin 00:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Great motive and outstanding composition. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Some chromatic aberrations ? ;-) Look closely, this image features ca's galore on contrasting edges. And as stated by Savin, the image looks unnatural in the details. Some edges are visible, others are completely vanished in the surrounding smudgy rendition of the colors. This isn't even a QI to me. --Granada (talk) 07:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quality not at FP level. No wow, photographically. (also no embedded colour profile). -- Colin (talk) 12:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per overoverprocessing and CAs noted by others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 03:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)