Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agelaius phoeniceus (11697084116).jpg

File:Agelaius phoeniceus (11697084116).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2016 at 00:45:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Agelaius phoeniceus (11697084116).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agelaius phoeniceus (11697084116).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
•  Info created by Tom Hilton - uploaded by Josve05a - nominated by Josve05a -- Josve05a (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Josve05a (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I like the bird and the light, and I actually find this bokeh pleasing to look at. But it will be noted that this photo is quite a lot smaller than most photos of members of the Animal Kingdom that get considered for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image would be borderline QI. Charles (talk) 12:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think this is just QI. -- Colin (talk) 13:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per other opposers. Overexposed parts, sharpness unsufficient, probable chromatic noise in some feathers.--Jebulon (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Pose was a good start, but per Jebulon and other opposers it's more than done in by the unsharpness, CA, maladjusted white balance, noise, and clipping on the wings. I would go further than Charles and decline it were it nominated for QI. Daniel Case (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose A nice shot, but there is a high expectation for bird photos, and I don't think this is high enough quality for FP. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jebulon. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco² 15:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)