Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amphithéâtre d'ElJem 11.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Amphithéâtre d'ElJem 11.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2016 at 11:01:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
- Info created by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC) - uploaded by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC) - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nice picture, but compare this one, which we're about to feature. The entire arena is sharp at full size in that picture, the file size is much bigger, and there are no random people in it. I feel like you are continuing to improve your skills, and this is a great motif, but please try taking sharper photos of it when no-one is hanging onto the left side. I guess I have to mildly Oppose a feature, because the quality of Poco's photos of this amphitheatre is so high that this one, while good, doesn't make the cut. But if you can take another picture in which the amphitheatre is completely sharp, do try submitting that one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Another thing that voters on FPC frequently object to is for large parts of the subject to be in shadow, so try to take a photo of this motif when there is more even light, or failing that, more interesting light. -- Ikan Kekek
Comment Dear Ikan Kekek I will do my best --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
(talk) 12:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Procedural oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment dear Ikan Kekek and dear Daniel Case I made a file with less random people and sharper I uploaded it and I reverted the old one if it is ok for FP let me change it --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 05:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - New files should be nominated separately. Besides, the random people are not at all the only thing preventing this from being featurable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan. ~ Moheen (talk) 06:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose not sharp in fully view --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 21:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)