Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 021.jpg

File:Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 021.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2017 at 05:58:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 021.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 021.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural # Switserland Natural phenomena.
•  Info Narrowed bend in the Sapüner stream causes a rapid acceleration. This photo fascinates me. The wildly flowing cold water splashes almost from the screen. All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I thought of this picture as a possible FP when I saw it in QIC. I find it a compelling capture of the speed and power of a mountain stream, as you do. Thanks for taking the photo and nominating it here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think it is not a special picture, especially with that green-yellowish vegetation visible.Paolobon140 (talk) 10:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry but I'm not wowed either, seeing as it's a close-up shot which makes it "just another shot of a stream", and the light doesn't really help.--Peulle (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- per Ikan. PumpkinSky talk 12:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful scenario. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Peulle, not convinced about the crop on the right/bottom Poco² 19:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too common subject and I don't like the time lapse of exposure (too low if a movement effect was desired, or too high if the water should be sharp) -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Colin (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't mind the whitewater, but that rock on the left just ruins it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 20:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)