Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eternal flame falls 7252.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Eternal flame falls 7252.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2009 at 03:43:59
Info created by Mpmajewski - uploaded by Mpmajewski - nominated by Mpmajewski -- Mpmajewski (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Mpmajewski (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)- Support --Lošmi (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Oppose It's always nice making long time exposure on water but I don't think it adds value. Besides that I don't like the composition and lighting. --Richard Bartz (talk) 14:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)- Oppose composition is not convincing - too cluttered for my taste. --AngMoKio (talk) 14:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Neutral, I like the concept but I think the execution is off. I dont like that F/22 was used instead of a ND filter, I think that the extended exposure was inadequate and not enough movement is shown. Also the flame looks semi cartoonish and not much to it. Theres got to be a better way for this concept :) Evilarry- Oppose Composition.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:45, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose —kallerna™ 11:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 09:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
