Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Falcon 9 COTS Demo F1 Launch.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Falcon 9 COTS Demo F1 Launch.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2010 at 15:20:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by NASA - uploaded by Galactic Penguin SST - nominated by Ras67 (talk) 15:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Info Falcon 9 launches with first Dragon spacecraft.
- Support -- Ras67 (talk) 15:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective distorsion. Nothing special (feauturable) among the numerous rocket launching pictures made by NASA and uploaded here in "Commons". IMO. --Jebulon (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Sorry, I don't see any perspective distortion. Can you please be a bit more specific (there are a lot of ways and image can be distorted!)? Every launch is different. Are we going to vote oppose on every motorcycle image because there is "Nothing special among the numerous motorcycle pictures"? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:13, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe, I don't know... Try !!--Jebulon (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support no distortion - perspective correction could be done, but changes the mood. composition is good. colours and sharpness are convincing. a sound shot, taken at the right moment. @jebulon: please be aware that although massive amounts of imagery are available, behind every launch a single person
pulled the triggerpushed the button of his camera. if talking about numerous pictures of a certain topic, no further pictures of any sort of insect would be needed. but the attempt of fpc is slightly different: to evaluate each single item by its very own pros and cons - that counts for crickets and rockets. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 00:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)- Comment In my opinion, the concrete structure and the pole with lights (right below) are disturbing (composition), and look leaning due to perspective distortion. I think I have now understood the FPC purpose in "Commons". But IMO, featuring photos made by NASA or US Army or other official agencies or professionals does not increase the value of the FPC project. Of course such pictures have their place in "Commons", but not in FPC, generally speaking. So it is not exactly the same with crickets, chemical elements, shells or prehistoric tools, which I may sometimes decline for many reasons, but which shows the work of "Commonists" here. I'm not sure I'm clear enough, sorry. About this one, I have nothing else to say :Nothing special among etc etc...--Jebulon (talk) 18:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose what's featurable?--MASHAUNIX 21:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Overall good quality and well caught moment, but the irrelevant foreground elements in the lower left corner are distracting IMO. --Slaunger (talk) 23:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 18 December 2010 (UTC)