User talk:George Chernilevsky

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
I respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons![edit]

Dear George Chernilevsky

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC[edit]

Hello George Chernilevsky,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.

Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Lint error in signature[edit]

Hello. There is a lint error in your signature, would you mind changing it from <font color="darkgreen">George Chernilevsky</font> to <span style="color:darkgreen;">George Chernilevsky</span>? --Minoraxtalk 10:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Fixed -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cyprinus carpio 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cyprinus carpio 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Cyprinus carpio 2021 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cyprinus carpio 2021 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


Problem with a Sockpuppet[edit]

Hi, George I have and, more generally, we have a problem with a user who uses false noses and many addresses to place these images, which are not bad but, which are not labeled. Several of us have talked to him and tracked him down on several encyclopedias but he goes on and laughs at us. How to get out of this bad path?

Here is the state of the discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Orlando Paride

Merci de ton avis... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, my friend.
I looked at the discussion and i don't see any formal reason to delete these files according to the rules, unfortunately.
Très amical --George Chernilevsky talk 20:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India[edit]

Hi George Chernilevsky, Hope you are doing well. I sent you email about the Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India jury. Could you please confirm if you have received the mail or not? Regards--Atudu (talk) 11:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes, i received the E-mail. I agree to participate in the jury
Best regards, George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification[edit]

Erinaceus roumanicus 2020 G2.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Erinaceus roumanicus 2020 G2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ameiurus melas 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ameiurus melas 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Carassius gibelio male 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carassius gibelio male 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Common dandelion 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common dandelion 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Common dandelion 2021 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common dandelion 2021 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Magnolia liliiflora 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magnolia liliiflora 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Locomotive ChME3T-7368 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Locomotive ChME3T-7368 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tree peony flower 2021 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tree peony flower 2021 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Tree peony flower 2021 G3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tree peony flower 2021 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Railway Vinnytsia 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railway Vinnytsia 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Tree peony flower 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tree peony flower 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality----Lmbuga 13:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Syringa vulgaris 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syringa vulgaris 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
DR1A-161 diesel trainset 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DR1A-161 diesel trainset 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Shadows at the right could be brighter. --XRay 03:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Deleted images[edit]

You closed the following deletion requests and supposedly deleted the images; but, they are still available on the commons:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Finnoy_komm.png
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bodo_komm.png

Take a look? -- Worldlydev (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Temporary server error. I'll look again a little later. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Same trouble with File:Hobol komm.png.
Problem reported to software developers [1]. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Esox lucius 2021 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esox lucius 2021 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Esox lucius 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esox lucius 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ximonic 13:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helix pomatia 2021 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helix pomatia 2021 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Helix pomatia 2021 G5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helix pomatia 2021 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Helix pomatia 2021 G4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helix pomatia 2021 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Longstanding deletion requests[edit]

Would you be willing to look at all the images I have categorized into this category: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Superseded_locator_maps_of_counties_of_Norway ? As far as I know they should alle be eligible and the deletion requests have been open for quite some time. Thanks -- Worldlydev (talk) 15:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I processed all the files that were nominated for deletion -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)