Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Giant Otter (Pteronura brasiliensis), Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas Thomas-Fuhrmann 02.jpg

File:Giant Otter (Pteronura brasiliensis), Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas Thomas-Fuhrmann 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2022 at 08:00:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Giant Otter (Pteronura brasiliensis), Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas Thomas-Fuhrmann 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Giant Otter (Pteronura brasiliensis), Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas Thomas-Fuhrmann 02.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Mustelidae (Mustelids)
•  Info created & uploaded by Snowmanstudios - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

• My initial enthusiasm has waned. 1/800 sec with such a long lens is not ideal for a moving target. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

@Tomer T thank you for nominating this image! Snowmanstudios (talk) 11:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose Very nice, but unfortunately too much of motion blur. --A.Savin 12:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm leaning toward opposing because it's sharp at 30% but not 40%. That said, if the prey animal can be identified, it should be identified and categorized. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose what a good moment, but the focus point got somewhere on the nose and because of this most of the otter is oof, too bad... -- Ivar (talk) 18:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 08:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)