Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lund Cathedral 2017-08-17 4.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Lund Cathedral 2017-08-17 4.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2020 at 10:07:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 10:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 10:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Sorry, it's a good, valuable photo, but I don't find this great compared to photos of other church interiors, because of the random tourists doing random things, and parts of the ceiling aren't that sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose Unsharp ceiling, per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)- Oppose I suspect Colin would himself no longer see this image as an FP. It's certainly not bad and deserves its QI label, but given the competition within the church-interior genre it no longer makes the cut in terms of resolution, detail or sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment I agree that the ceiling is blurred (could be cut out). I disagree with the fact that the tourists are, so to speak, spoiling the picture. There are many excellent photos with emphty churches. These churches look like dead. But churches should be there for the people. Therefore I think that the presence of people should not lead to devaluation! Je-str (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- I agree, I don't mind church pictures that have people in them. Either with or without is fine for me. Cmao20 (talk) 20:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- It's not an issue that there are people in the photo. The issue is that they are doing random, distracting things - scratching their back, taking photos - and the ghosting is somewhat problematic, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
