Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pararge aegeria in cornwall.JPG

File:Pararge aegeria in cornwall.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2014 at 23:30:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pararge aegeria in cornwall.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pararge aegeria in cornwall.JPG

•  Info created by Baresi_franco - uploaded by Baresi_franco - nominated by Baresi_franco -- Baresi franco (talk) 23:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Baresi franco (talk) 23:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral Difficult, the sharpness of the head and body is very good, but the lighting is not the best and there are overexposed areas Poco² 22:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor lighting Gidip (talk) 07:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Terrible, terrible lighting (sunlight too harsh), horrible aperture setting resulting in 40% of the butterfly being unsharp. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 17:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

   CommentNot sure whether it is really necessary to use "terrible, terrible, horrible" in a useful review. After all, the aim should be to help the photographer improve. The photo might not be good enough for FP, but it is not a completely unreasonable nomination. Also I'm not sure that "Strong oppose" really is necessary here, doesn't do much but drama IMO. --DXR (talk) 17:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose nice but overexposed Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Jee 08:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)