Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pierres gravées Khumbu.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pierres gravées Khumbu.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2017 at 17:04:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Monuments and memorials
- Info created by Gozitano - uploaded by Gozitano - nominated by Gozitano -- Gozitano (talk) 17:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Gozitano (talk) 17:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm leaning toward supporting this because it's so interesting to look at. But could you possibly extend the photo down a little further so that we can see the rest of the stone in the bottom middle? I don't like the sensation of being cut off while moving my eye around the picture frame. Escusez-moi de ne pas ecrire en francais. Il faut tant de temps pour moi d'ecrire choses comme ca en francais. Et soyez le bienvenue ici! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, and thank you for your welcoming. Sorry, but I am not sure to quite understand what you are asking for. You mean that you prefer I cut the picture like this ?
- No, I would like for the photo you submitted to extend further down, so that the large stone in the middle of the bottom of the picture frame could be seen in full, if that's possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, Ok. Not possible in fact, the picture is the original framing, sorry.--Gozitano (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- No, I would like for the photo you submitted to extend further down, so that the large stone in the middle of the bottom of the picture frame could be seen in full, if that's possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, and thank you for your welcoming. Sorry, but I am not sure to quite understand what you are asking for. You mean that you prefer I cut the picture like this ?
- Oppose It is an interesting and unusual monument (here on COM:FP) and I would like to be able to support it but it looks overexposed to me, especially the big rock down right. Also for an FP, I would like a bit nuanced lighting and the text to be sharper, the focus is more on the rocks in the water than the text rock. Sorry. --cart-Talk 19:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cart. lNeverCry 22:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per cart. Overexposed areas of rock and water look like some attempt was made to mitigate it in processing, leaving a sort of artificial look. Daniel Case (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results: