Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pilsumer Kirche 2010.jpg

File:Pilsumer Kirche 2010.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2010 at 20:09:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pilsumer Kirche 2010.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pilsumer Kirche 2010.jpg

1052

1782

850

2086

7323

4050

distorted

3338

830

526

1580

7323

4050

distorted

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Carschten. The gigantic church of the small village Pilsum in the northwest of Germany. Changes by the users Regi51 and derHexer, many thanks to them. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support, I like it. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Colours seem exaggerated. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

better now? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, colours and sharpness/resolution are fine at this one, but what happend to the building? The whole church is very, very distorted. I've set some image notes to show what i mean. Gruß mathias K 16:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree, compare with File:Kreuzkirche Pilsum msu8.jpg. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Info uploaded new version. Better now? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - very good, sharp and nice colours. -- Felix König ✉ 18:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Info new version is better, but only a little! Have a look at the vertical lines, nearly everyone is sill not vertical but they should be at a picture like this. --mathias K 08:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Not a very good angle, but great detail and an interesting location. --IdLoveOne (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

 Oppose Sorry, you've already voted above. --mathias K 10:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC) The church is old, but in reality it is still standing upright; the distortions in this photomontage are completely unencyclopedic. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /08:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture