Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red-whiskered bulbul (সিপাহি বুলবুলি).jpg

File:Red-whiskered bulbul (সিপাহি বুলবুলি).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2020 at 23:57:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Red-whiskered bulbul (সিপাহি বুলবুলি).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red-whiskered bulbul (সিপাহি বুলবুলি).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Pycnonotidae_(Bulbuls)
•  Info created by Nafis Ameen - uploaded by Nafis Ameen - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 23:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 23:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Nice, but considering the exceptional quality of bird FPs, I don't think it's sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral I think the quality is OK, it's not pinpoint sharp but it's good enough for me. The main issue I see is with the composition. The crop is too tight at the bottom, with no room at all between the red flower and the edge of the frame. Overall, not enough to support, not enough to oppose. Cmao20 (talk) 08:05, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

  I will try to contact the author on Instagram --Andrei (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

   Info I was able to obtain a higher resolution of the photo (but not a better crop) --Andrei (talk) 21:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - It's probably sharp enough at this resolution, so I've crossed out my opposing vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

• Other way round for me, I'm afraid. The new version is IMO inferior to the previous one. When downsized to 3000x2000px across (same size as the original) it now looks noisy and oversharpened, plus the crop is even tighter than before. I think I would have to  Oppose this version. Cmao20 (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient quality, looks like the 24mpix version is just an upscale of the 6mpix one. --A.Savin 04:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Without prejudice to other arguments, the bottom crop is too tight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 16:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)