Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:São Paulo downtown in Black and White.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2015 at 13:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by The Photographer -- The_Photographer (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Oh gosh, selective colour, ew! And it's not even a correct selective colour tech, because we have another colour at the background... And the line on the floor is so wrong... even the original photo is not a FP photo, nothing punching here. -- RTA 14:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Done Color problem is done, please what do you mean about line on the floor is so wrong?. Thanks --The_Photographer (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- The line could be horizontal, but I think that the photographer is not to blame if it is so. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- The main problem here is the lines moves our eyes away from the subject... If you had crouch the zebra crossing would give you lines to the car, the buildings at back would appear at photo, and them we could have a good photo of Camaro, now, we have a poor photo of... I don't know, not even the name is correct, so I do not know what was the intention here. -- RTA 11:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- The line could be horizontal, but I think that the photographer is not to blame if it is so. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks like a good example for "Unnecessary or inappropriate use of artistic filters and effects". Being the São Paulo variation of "New York Taxi No. 1.", this picture lacks an original and genuine own idea - or to put it plainly: it has no wow. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- I had never heard of that taxi picture. I'm having a false idea or some negative votes in my FPC are full with love?. It would be nice to receive objective and less crowded reviews circumstantial elements. It is as if there were a need to criticize for criticizing. :) --The_Photographer (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Or maybe because you need improve your shoots skill before send tons of photos to FP? -- RTA 11:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- I had never heard of that taxi picture. I'm having a false idea or some negative votes in my FPC are full with love?. It would be nice to receive objective and less crowded reviews circumstantial elements. It is as if there were a need to criticize for criticizing. :) --The_Photographer (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment On a pure esthetic/photographic point of view, this is much more interesting than the color version below. This could made a good ad for this car. However, I don't see the educational use. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment concerning educational use, I think it would make an excellent example for en:Selective color/en:Selective color photography. --El Grafo (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]
- Info Not B&W version of the picture. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Neutral I see a dust spot. Interesing scene, but only this. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Its your alt version, you could try fix it. Yes because the world is colorfull yeaaaaaaaaaaaah!!! --The_Photographer (talk) 18:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Because my world is not Colorfull The_Photographer (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- @The Photographer: I suggest you nominate this picture: File:Mirante do Vale Building Facade.jpg. I already have two active nominations. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
