User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

What are you talking about?[edit]

I gave full credits to the author. Get out of my face. I am uploading it again, whether you like it or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liamgmack (talk • contribs) 13:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your Mailadress ?[edit]

Hi Yann, do you have an email adress? The bernina International want to send you the licences of the two pictures via mail. Is this ok? Can you send me an PM ? Best, Mike

Why you delete my page ?[edit]

Hello, Yann. I wrote information about me, but everything was delited. Why ? p.s. here i upload my own photos of my patient and my surgery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oleg*vet eye*Yastrebov (talk • contribs)


I didn't read all the licenses to upload a photo, I've uploaded some photographs which 're taken by me. And previously some map of out locality. But I did a mistake by uploading the photographs of Oriya film poster from different websites with the source code, but those were deleted. But I've a photograph taken on July 30 about Rasagola has also been deleted. Now, I'm sorry what I did. I never upload those pics.. Gapu (User talk:Ssgapu) 18:23, 13 November 2015



Please see File:Raja Harishchandra- 1913- India's First Silent Film- FULL FOOTAGE.webm. Uploading it as a .webm file worked. (This is the one more trick I mentioned) Natuur12 (talk) 23:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Images you request for delete[edit]

Images Files you request for delete in Greek Wikipedia Παλούμπα, Δημήτρης Πλαπούτας, Γεωργάκης Πλαπούτας, In few hours I will add the source in all jpegs, most of them are mine, others from village blogspot. please give me some time.

most pictures are from my personal file of photos that I captured with my Nikon , others from local historic book. So I have to replace the "own" word with the source title? right? please leave me a message. Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Viliop. Viliop (Talk Viliop)

@Viliop: Hi,
For old paintings, you need to provide the painter's name, and the date of the painting (at least approximately). For photographs, you need the formal written permission from the photographer. Since I don't speak Greek, I can't do it for you from the page you linked. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Its Ok, I checked the images og the article Παλούμπα some are mine some are from websites. please check. Danke --Viliop (talk) 19:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Υann I edited the source of a picture File:Paloumpaioi.jpg you request license, it's mine, I edited, it's ok. please remove the caution sign. thank you for the copyright sensitivity. Danke --Viliop (talk)

Removing Images[edit]

Hi Yann,

I can't seem to fathom what I'm doing wrong with images. I've checked with the publisher of the content who provided email permission allowing us to use the image. I can't find it posted online ANYWHERE other than our personal flickr page. Could you enlighten us to what we are doing wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 375mon (talk • contribs)

@375mon: Hi,
You uploaded files from the Internet without providing a permission from the copyright owner. For all content previously published elsewhere, you need a formal written permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Raja Harishchandra- 1913- India's First Silent Film.webm[edit]

Hello Yann, le statut des droits sur les 21 premières minutes de cette version du film n'est pas clair. Il ne s'agit pas du film original mais d'un documentaire à son sujet, avec un générique de fin. C'est pourquoi j'avais téléversé de mon côté File:Raja Harishchandra (1913).webm, au demeurant dans une meilleure résolution. Il est notoire que si le film original faisait environ 40 minutes, il n'en subsiste pas une copie complète [1]. J'ai téléversé une version sans le documentaire initial. Il faudrait supprimer la version antérieure. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 10:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

@Racconish: Bonjour,
OK merci. J'ai caché l'ancienne version. Il faut aussi noté qu'il existe une autre version, produite en 1917. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


Can you delete it? I accidentally upload this file: File:Рак_в_аквариуме.jpg. DeletedUser (talk) 08:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, A deletion request is open. Let's wait. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded it file, there must be something to wait? DeletedUser (talk) 08:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done by Geagea. Usually, we don't (speedy) delete files uploaded after one week. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Map of Greek colonies on the northern Black Sea coast.[edit]

You have reversed Simferopol and Sevastopol. Sevastopol is on the coast, Simferopol is inland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)

Hi, I can't understand what you are talking about. Can you explain? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Beals socks[edit]

Please check my post - I added a second sock, please block it as well. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

uploading photos for professional soccer player[edit]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs) 17:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

@Goodfellabear: Hi,
You must read COM:L before uploading anything here. If the files are not made directly by you, the copyright owner needs to send a formal written permission. Idem if the content has been previously published elsewhere. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Please ask me if you have more questions. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Yann, this is becoming annoying because the OTRS helpdesk gave HappySquirrel instructions on how to load up our 2 very personal and very important images on to our article. 1 is from Loyola's yearbook which I took and Loyola has told us many times that all of their yearbook stuff is good for public use and the other one is from a newspaper clip Tasos was mentioned on in the Herndon Observer - the newspaper does not exist anymore but that newspaper clip has been distributed in all of Herndon, all of Reston, within high schools and Tasos himself has given us permission to use. Please allow us to complete this wikipedia story the way we want without being such a strict Wikipedia police officer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs) 00:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Also Yann, I see you remove many images from all over - our images our personal images of Tasos Vatikiotis as he himself has give permission to use the Herndon Observer newspaper article as well as his picture in his college's yearbook - happysquirrel and the tea party (both wikipedians) got permission from the OTRS in June, near 5 months ago and everything has been fine until you came along and absolutely deleted both images - if you are so well round and such a good Wikipedian tell us the correct licensing code to put so we can go about our way with peace of mind - *STOP threatening us and embarassing us and HELP us - HappySquirrel helped us back in June and now you have ruined it for us. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellabear (talk • contribs) 00:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
@Goodfellabear: Hi,
As I wrote above, please send a permission and the files can be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
    • Yann, please undelete the photos and put the correct permissions on there since you are an active Wikipedia editor - these are normal and down to earth photos of the mentioned person playing soccer in college and being highlighted in a local newspaper - we are not creating a gateway to Mars or anything - please get permission via the OTRS or classify them with correct licensing code - these are simple images, nothing complexed about them. There is nothing private about them - they are public images that have been printed by the thousands. Please lead by example and get this sort it out. Thanks.
    • Yann, please lead by example and help with this issue. As Ghandi said, "be the change you want to see in the world" and as your front page reads - A novice was once curious about the nature of the Edit Count. He approached the Zen master and asked, "Zen master, what is the nature of the Edit Count?" "The Edit Count is as a road," replied the Zen master. "You must travel the road to reach your destination, and some may travel longer roads than others. But do not judge the person at your door by the length of the road he has traveled to reach you." And the novice was Enlightened.
    • Yann, please follow up on [Ticket#: 2015112310024445].: Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2015112310024445]. Yours sincerely, The Volunteer Response Team


(src) Tan I am the creator and some owner the material I uploaded. Please undelete the files now. My name is David Donohue. You can see my name on the posters and everywhere else. You can reach me at 323 363 0562 if you have any quest. Now please undelete all files for ArchiveOfTheArts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchiveOfTheArts (talk • contribs) 2015-11-20T19:11:21 (UTC)

@ArchiveOfTheArts: Hi,
Please send a permission to COM:OTRS, also as instructed by Jim on COM:UDR, then the files can be undeleted. Here the uploader has to prove than the files are free, not the opposite. Please contact us again when you have a ticket number with a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


Hi, why you deleted this picture : File:Mairie de Vesoul.jpg ? 00:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

@Dfs748: Hi,
This image contains a watermark "A. R. Photographie", so the copyright owner needs to send a permission through COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
ok guy, can you delete "File:Mairie de Vesoul 4.jpg" and "File:Mairie de Vesoul 2.jpg" ? 15:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 17:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Shree Krishna Janma (1918).webm[edit]

Hello, toutes mes excuses, j'ai omis le commentaire de révocation : retour à la version muette, la bande son n'étant pas dans le domaine public. Il faudrait supprimer la version sonorisée Clin. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 07:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Demande d'OTRS[edit]

Cher Yann, bonjour,

Roxane Rodriguez vous a écrit le 22 Octobre 2015 pour une demande d'OTRS. Nous avons été contacté par le contributeur 123DL souhaitant faire une page sur son travail. 123DL vient de nous contacter à nouveau pour savoir si nous avions reçu de vos nouvelles.

Nous vous remercions de nous confirmer si vous avez bien reçu notre demande pour que 123 DL poursuive sa page.

Agence Roxane Rodriguez —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:E35:8787:70C0:BC42:73AC:4A1D:2198 (talk) 13:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


For this edit, see here.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 Hi,
I have seen this page before removing your thumbnail. You should use a logo instead. A thumb like this is quite disturbing, and doesn't bring any additional value. BTW your nomination is much too small to be a featured picture. Please read the guidelines and check the images before nominating. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


At first, I didn't see your mother tongue is French. Je vais donc communiquer avec vous en français. Est-ce que la présence de cette photographie (File:Vesoul Agglomération sud.jpg) est légal sur Commons ? 22:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Peut-être pas. Demande de suppression créée. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Et donc comment peut-on savoir le code EXIF ? 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Tout en bas de la page, section "Metadata". Yann (talk) 14:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Merci pour votre réponse. Et donc, en fait qu'est ce que le EXIF ? 15:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Ce sont des données enregistrées par l'appareil en même temps que la photo elle-même. Outre des infos techniques, elles peuvent inclure le nom de l'auteur, le copyright, une description, la date de création, etc. Voir fr:Exchangeable image file format. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Merci pour votre réponse détaillée. Je pourrai donc à nouveau vous signaler des photos illicitement présente dans Commons. Cette photo (File:Place de la République - Patinoire.jpg) n'est pas légale si j'ai bien compris, mais celle-ci (File:Place de la République (Vesoul) 2.jpg) oui ? 23:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Pas de souci pour ces deux photos. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Trueno Azul 2015.png[edit]

Hi Yann,

You have previously had my file deleted. I had that work commissioned and is therefore my own.

Here is a screenshot of my emails:

Could I have it restored please?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therealflea (talk • contribs)

@Therealflea: Hi,
As for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)


I was in the process of digging further into the image's background when I saw you'd changed it to a DR. You beat me to the punch on the change, as it's an odd lil' duck. Tabercil (talk) 23:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Fake Copyright Violation[edit]

File:Serrania_de_Motilones_y_Perija.jpg As seen here the picture was a natural landscape of public domain besides that otorge author and the source of which was directed by the author himself, I appreciate to stop to remove such files since it clearly does not constitute a violation of the rights of author and could be considered a false claim (YonedgeHp (talk) 23:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC))

@YonedgeHp: Hi,
This file is copied from the Internet © All Rights Reserved by edwintpu without the permission from the author. So yes, it is a copyright violation. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bikini car wash at Twin Peaks, Round Rock[edit]

Hi, Yann, I noticed your edit without andy summary and wonder why. thank tou for your time. Lotje (talk) 17:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

@Lotje: the DR has been closed, no further edits should be made to it. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry sorry, I didn't pay attention. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 17:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Château de Franchevelle[edit]

Bonjour Yann, j'ai ajouté le château de Franchevelle pris en 1923.


Je n'ai pas réussi à mettre la catégorie > 70 ans. Idem pour mes daguerréotype du Saint-Mont. Comment faut-il procéder ? Merci d'avance. Cordialement --Amage9 (talk) 12:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

@Amage9: Bonjour,
Il ne faut pas mettre {{own}} si tu n'as pas pris la photo toi-même. Il faut donner la source (scan d'une carte postale, copie sur Internet, etc.). Dans l'état, il n'y a pas assez d'info. C'est souvent le cas des images trouvées sur Internet. Qui est le photographe ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: merci, je n'ai pas trouvé les photos sur internet, les photos du Saint-Mont sont inédites sur le net elles viennent de la famille mais nous n'avons pas le nom du photographe. Pour le château c'est bien une carte postale que l'on retrouve sur Delcampe, elle m'appartient je peux éventuellement mettre le verso qui n'est pas sur le net mais il n'y a que des informations personnelles sans nom de photographe ou éditeur.
Cordialement--Amage9 (talk) 16:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
@Amage9: Oui, ce serait utile de mettre le verso. Cela permet d'être sûr que le photographe n'est pas mentionné. Pour les photos de Saint-Mont, il n'y a pas de problème vu la date, mais il faut quand même indiquer correctement la source. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
@Yann:je te remercie pour ces conseils, j'espère être dans les clous après les modifications et l'ajout du verso.
Bonne soirée, --Amage9 (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your early closure[edit]

You deleted a whole bunch of car wash images recently. You seem to have deleted them early, without allowing a full discussion. User:Tm had just added a whole bunch more images on November 23rd, and you deleted the whole lot, just two days later.

I just voiced a keep opinion on the discussion of the category for these images, and was going to slightly modify it for the discussion of the individual images, only to find the discussion seems to have had an early closure.

I think the point someone else made, as to how policy does not place a limit on how many in scope images we have is a good point. We have thousands of images of monuments like the Statue of Liberty. I don't come here to be an art critic. I don't think it is our role to judge the artistic merit of our images.

A few years ago an image of an excursion vessel that plied the Danube was nominated for deletion. The nominator's justification was that we had a dozen other images of that excursion vessel, and they thought that this image was of inferior quality, because it showed some tourists, in the background. Well, of course, a dozen images is not actually that many. Further, as a vessel employed to carry tourists, I thought that the tourists in this image enhanced its value, rather than detract from its value. It was this discussion which made me critical of the argument repeated here -- that we already have enough images of this type.

In your closure you did not explain why you supported the reasoning of the "we already have enough images of this type."

So, I am going to ask you to re-open the discussion, to allow the usual discussion period. Geo Swan (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Here is the argument I was going to adapt for the discussion i think you closed prematurely
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep - I am a proponent for documenting articles and events that seem beneath notice. This kind of car wash, where young, scantily clad women, wash cars, may seem common enough that we should regard it as beneath notice, but I think this is a mistake. It is a common meme in movies and television. I think that makes these events in scope, as images of these events help reach an understanding of today's society -- and the societies of the last several decades.

    For all we know, changes in automotive technology, or petroleum product use, or morality, could mean people stop holding this kind of event. One might argue that anyone who read about this kind of car wash can always look for a movie or TV show that dramatized one. First, images of an actual event are superior to images from a dramatization of this kind of event; second, the movies are all proprietary, and still images from them could not be freely used in an academic paper or newspaper article.

    Two decades ago the arterial streets of the city I live in were lined by individual parking meters. There was one per parking spot. They were coin operated, mechanical devices. It seemed gradual, at first, but over a period of just a couple of years, every one of those rows of old mechanical parking meters was replaced by a computer controlled meter. It could accept credit cards, and bank cards, as well as coins and bills; it was solar powered; it had a little antennae for communicating with HQ. What this meant was that anyone who wanted to study the old style parking meter had to cross their fingers and hope enough people had decided to document an article that seemed beneath notice.

    I think the same applies to these images. What does the genuine scholar, who wants to study this phenomenon, do, if we delete all these images on the grounds they are trivial, and beneath notice? Geo Swan (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Excuse me. I wrote that Tm placed additional images in the discussion on November 23. It looks like you, yourself added the additional images. Geo Swan (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, You are a bit late. See the discussion on the VP. 1. I didn't close the DR early. 2. These files are junk from Flickr, have little education value, and we don't need to have 190 of them. If you want them undelete, please ask on COM:UDR. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Okay, now I have looked at the VP discussion. I don't see any explanation, from you, as to why you felt authorized to delete a large number of images that weren't given the normal seven days of discussion.
  • I don't see you offering an explanation as to why you think you can limit the number of in-scope images we have of an event.
  • There is a very uncollegial meme, "never explain, never apologize". I don't like pointing this out to you, but you do recognize that it looks like you choose to follow this model? Geo Swan (talk) 06:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Look, I won't repeat myself 36 times. The DR was for the whole category, and this is very clearly stated at the beginning. These images are out of scope. I already said that on the VP. If you want to watch them, there are still available on Flickr, so nothing is definitely lost. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
  • If the DR was for the whole category, then every file under consideration should have had a notice placed on it, and should only have been deleted seven days after that notice was placed. Anything short of that means that people who had THAT image on their watchlist weren't given fair notice its deletion was under consideration.
I think it is irrelevant if the nominator encountered some kind of technical difficulty. The files under consideration, are the ones that were properly nominated, and their intentions aren't relevant, particularly since, if it was really important, they could have completed the nomination process, more slowly, through brute force. Geo Swan (talk) 22:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


May you have some look at his upload list? You just deleted three of this pictures of snowmobiles as copyvio, but there is a bunch more Special:ListFiles/Pdir. All this xxkB and 1xxkB stuff is taken from here (not only page 30, but also earlier and later). Thanks a lot. --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Deleted 4 more. Also DR created for all small images without EXIF data. Thanks for reporting. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

deleted within one day[edit]

Hi, These photos are given by the owner of the photographs , If you guys want to delete you need to give us time to prove these are original or not (deleted within one day ) .How do know is it copyrighted or not??? If its on a web, you can't guarantee its copyrighted or not(you don't know who is the copyright owner), These photos are owned by Darshana Ruwan Dissanayaka , some photos took by His Cameraman (Hired),and some are purchased . So, why don't you give us the time to prove it ??.. anyway we love to contribute to Wikipedia but these type of activities cause to disappointment of users!!

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknownlabz (talk • contribs)

@Unknownlabz: Did they give you the permission to publish their photographs into a free license? If they did, please forward the permission to OTRS. Almost everything in the web is copyrighted. Please read first Commons:Licensing and Commons:Precautionary principle before uploading images that are not your own work. Thanks, Poké95 09:34, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, @Pokéfan95: Thank you for the info , In here they are(Web Admins) not worrying about online copyright, They uploaded users photographs on to the webs without his permissions. i contacted the user he will send an email within seven days.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknownlabz (talk • contribs)
@Unknownlabz: Please say to him that when e-mailing the OTRS, it is recommended to use Commons:Email templates (link: Thanks! Poké95 04:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Suppression d'une photo[edit]

Bonjour, je reçois un mail disant que vous avez supprimé ma photo, Jacques Brasseul.jpg. Quelle mouche vous a piqué ? C'est une photo personnelle, qui m'appartient, tirée de ma bibliothèque, je ne vois pas bien la raison de cette suppression. Merci de la laisser tranquille si je la remets, bien à vous, JB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrasseul (talk • contribs)

@Jbrasseul: Bonjour,
Nous avons une politique très stricte en ce qui concerne les droits d'auteur, qui dans ce cas, appartiennent au photographe. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure pour envoyer une autorisation. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Jbrasseul écrit : Mais c'est moi le photographe !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrasseul (talk • contribs) 07:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
@Jbrasseul: Ça m'étonnerait : c'est une photo de vous, et ce n'est pas un selfie. En plus, il y a une copie sur [2]. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Non, non, rassurez-vous, il n'y a là rien d'étonnant, c'est une photo que j'ai prise moi-même avec mon appareil et le retardateur, elle date de 2004, a été prise à l'Île de Ré et n'appartient qu'à moi, j'ai d'ailleurs déclaré cela sur votre site. S'il-vous plaît, remettez cette photo, il n'y a aucun problème de copyright. Encore une fois, ELLE M'APPARTIENT. Quant à son utilisation sur le site que vous citez, Atlantico, c'est moi qui leur ai donné, vous voyez bien que l'article est de moi, et ils m'ont demandé une photo pour illustrer cet interview. Merci beaucoup et bien cordialement, Jacques Brasseul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrasseul (talk • contribs) 11:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Jbrasseul: OK, je vous crois, mais il serait quand même préférable que vous envoyez une confirmation, car l'image a été publiée ailleurs auparavant, à moins que vous pouviez importer la photo originale. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Merci, c'est gentil, j'ai remis la photo en place, sur ma page Wikipedia. Mais à qui dois-je envoyer la confirmation ? Par ailleurs, j'ai du mal à comprendre pourquoi c'est si simple d'écrire ce qu'on veut sur sa page, et si compliqué de mettre une banale photo personnelle ? Bien à vous, Jacques — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbrasseul (talk • contribs) 11:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Jbrasseul: Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure, et ajoutez {{OTRS pending}} dans la description si vous ne voulez pas que la photo soit supprimée. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

OK, merci, ça a l'air compliqué...Jbrasseul (talk) 12:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

What did I do?[edit]

Yann, you left a message that I did some form of vandalism. What did I do? I don't edit on wikimedia commons, but I've been a faithful contributor to Wikipedia for many years. Please advise me more specifically what I did wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)

Hi, I don't know sine you added this message while logged out. Please log in, and tell me what's your account. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
i responded from my mobile device. this message has my log in. --Ahodges7 (talk) 03:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
@Ahodges7: You moved Commons:File renaming to Commons:SE Asia Memorial, United States Military Academy, which is vandalism. If it is a mistake, you should have reverted your move. Poké95 05:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

My apologies for my mistake in trying to fix an error on my part. When I created the image file "SW Asia Memorial, United States Military Academy.jpg", I incorrectly titled it as the "SW Asia Memorial", when it actually should be the "SOUTHEAST Asia Memorial". I was contacted by a member of the Class of 1962 who asked me to rename the file correctly. In my attempt, I just made it worse. My apologies and I request that you or another admin change the name of the image to accurately reflect the name of the memorial.--Ahodges7 (talk) 11:54, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Ahodges7: Hi,
To move/rename a file, please add {{rename}} on the page description. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


but if want to upload Real Desperado logo and the new Wild order logo what do i have to do?

thank you

NoahPuroresu123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoahPuroresu123 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@NoahPuroresu123: Hi,
On Commons, you need to provide a formal written permission from the copyright owner (see COM:OTRS). You can do it on the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


Just for your notification: Bwag doesn´t want to discuss with me. Chaddy (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Ortelli 2015.jpg[edit]

Hola como estas? Veo que has borrado una fotografía de mi autoría, sin previamente consultarmelo. Esa imagen era un fragmento de la una fotografía que tomé en el año 2011. Si quieres cerciorarte de que lo que te digo es verdad, te invito a que veas la imagen en mi sitio de Facebook, donde observarás la foto completa. Puedes ver esa imagen entrando aquí. Si hay algo que me puedas aconsejar, hazmelo llegar. Saludos. --Diego HC (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Diego HC: Hi,
Sorry, I don't speak Spanish. The link you give is dead. Anyway, if the photo was published elsewhere previously a formal written permission is necessary. Please see COM:OTRS/es (in Spanish) for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Yann[edit]

Hi Yann, I am contacting you re: File:'No Joke' Poster.jpg.

The poster has the proper CC license and the ok from the rights holder. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! betty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettywilly (talk • contribs) 04:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Whoops, forgot to sign :)

Bettywilly (talk) 08:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

I am also wondering why:

File:Camp Death Poster Creative Commons Sharealike.jpg

...was also deleted. Again, both posters have a CC Sharealike license. Please undelete. Thanks Yann!

Bettywilly (talk) 08:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

As for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


Hello. You might not return the original appearance of the file. User "Bobyr" lock member should be extended. He vandals, many articles in the Russian Wikipedia with corrupted files. Please take action. I apologize for the bad english. Farsizabon (talk) 14:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

AN FYI[edit]

FYI Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#DR closed as kept, without file having a license. Josve05a (talk) 09:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


Hello.This file does not need to a discussion.Why do not you delete it speedily?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: Hi,
Please read COM:DR for what are acceptable reason for deletion. "Being small" is not one of them. Also you need to inform the uploader. The is best done with the gadget. See in your preferences. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)