Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wonder eye.png

Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2009 at 13:03:09

Info created by JalalV - uploaded by JalalV - nominated by JalalV -- JalalV (talk) 13:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JalalV (talk) 13:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting. --Acarpentier 17:41, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with Acarpentier. I wonder if an expert could find a better crop to improve it. --norro 23:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX^talk 10:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo (talk) 14:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The idea is good, but the execution isn't. There is way too much noise present. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Neutral It's worth watching - but - not enough smashing --Richard Bartz (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why png format and as a result no EXIF? Lycaon (talk) 18:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question Yes, why you converted this photo to PNG ? why you didn't upload the original JPEG ? is there anything in the EXIF that we should not know ;) ■ MMXX^talk 21:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Lol, the reason I saved it as a PNG file is because my camera only saves jpegs (no raw file), and PNG was the most universal lossless format I could think of. This is a simple crop to focus on the eye. I didn't realize the original was so interesting to people! JalalV (talk) 02:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done

Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Do we need this photo in Wikipedia? —kallerna™ 19:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Shure. Could illustrate reflection and moreover Commons is a media file repository for educational not strictly encyclopedical content. --Richard Bartz (talk) 19:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If a photo is useful in the Wikipedia or not is not relevant. --AngMoKio (talk) 10:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Idea is lovely, execution is quite good, but not enough for a Featured Picture (reflection is not centered). PNG? --Javier ME (talk) 19:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think the very minor flaws are enough to keep an artwork like this from FP. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Adam. --AlexanderKlink (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good idea Muhammad 05:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Massimo Catarinella. Lycaon (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. JalalV (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu