Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Charleston Hot peppers white background.jpg

Image:Charleston Hot peppers white background.jpg, Not Featured

• Nomination, very nice picture and not so arty it obscures the usefullness. // Liftarn 18:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not very sharp. Also, a cyclic arrangement is inappropriate, since the development of pepper is not a cyclic process. Red pepper will never get green again as the picture suggests. Calderwood 11:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp and a bit grainy even. — Lycaon 14:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Urban 05:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose - cut-out from background - MPF 18:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose--Shizhao 01:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose MGo 20:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose so, a couple of chilis against a glaring white background. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 03:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

•  Support Nice imaginative picture No-w-ay 12:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC) invalid vote (fake-signature) Kessa Ligerro 21:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
•  Support--Piolinfax 13:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Obviously it's not a cyclic process--Neutrality 04:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Did you really mean "support"? Your comment is an argument for "oppose" - and it is correct, therefore  Oppose Hein 14:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

No. It is obvious that it is not a cyclic process, and no reasonable person would make such a conclusion after looking at the photo. My support stands. --Neutrality 02:38, 4 February 2006 (UTC) support-symbol replaced by ordinary word to prevent miscountig of votes Calderwood 22:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

•  Support - can see it having a place in articles about peppers and (premature) harvesting. - Samsara 10:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Romary 12:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Tbc 17:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --TommesAC 23:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I believe it's unexpectedly difficult to take such a kind of photo --Morio 04:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support VIGNERON 16:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose on grounds of technical quality. Grainy & fuzzy in full size, dust specks on original slide. --Janke | Talk 09:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose, agree with Janke. --Dschwen 07:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support very cool. pfctdayelise 07:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
•  Support awesome. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 14:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

10 support, 10 oppose => not featured Kessa Ligerro 21:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)