Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Los angeles mountains to ocean pano.jpg

Image:Los angeles mountains to ocean pano.jpg - not featured

•  Info created by Mfield - uploaded by Mfield - nominated by Mfield -- Mfield 22:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mfield 22:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - amazing panorama. --- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 23:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose The panorama is quite good, but a height of 600px is really not large enough for this forum, I'm afraid. Lycaon 06:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Lycaon - dimensions of image. --Karelj 08:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ack Lycaon - what a shame about the dimensions, it's an excellent pano. --Freedom to share 09:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  •  Neutral The dimensions are not really that much of an issue (changed my mind). --Freedom to share 18:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - I suppose there are strong mitigating circunstances here: the unusually long pano and the very good image quality -- Alvesgaspar 11:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Wonderful work. 600px is plenty large enough for most screen resolutions. --Calibas 15:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Dany3000 08:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support You can't judge a photo by it's height. It's a panorama, and an excellent one as such. Opposing for it's height is nonsensical. Jon Harald Søby 12:14, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, it's only much small photos... --Beyond silence 19:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

It's 8000 wide, over 5 MP. yes it's much smaller than the 222 MP original, but until there's a non commercial CC license option on Commons, this is as big as it gets. This will still print 53"x4" at 150 dpi. Mfield 19:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose The picture is welcome on Commons, but can't in my view be featured at only 600px high. --MichaelMaggs 06:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose height. --Leafnode 20:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Myminpins 23:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Height. 150dpi is not that high quality. With 300dpi it's only 2 inches.--Lerdsuwa 18:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment You wouldn't be needing to print a panorama like this at 300dpi - at 60" wide, you would be viewing it from such a distance where 150dpi is plenty. Mfield 19:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

7 support, 6 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 23:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)