Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Manhattan1942.jpg

Image:Manhattan1942.jpg -> featured

• Nominate and support Apollomelos 07:07, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support. villy 08:21, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support Schaengel89 @me 09:24, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support —MRB 10:10, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• oppose bad quality -- Bernd Untiedt 23:32, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose -- Aka 11:24, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• SupportHistory is offen "poor quality". --Just1pin 08:16, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose, Thomas G. Graf 18:37, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. It would be a great photo if it were sharp, but alas it isn't. Interesting historical photo, but I don't think of featured quality. -- Infrogmation 20:34, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose.--Fanghong 00:43, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support What is all this obsession over "quality"? I don't get it. There is so much more to any photo than the technical side. --Thehero 10:12, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Ravn 10:30, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 13:33, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Agrees with Infrogmation. / Mats Halldin 08:20, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support. --MarkSweep 16:41, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support ack to Thehero --Roger Zenner -!- 15:22, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin