Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Versailles Chapel - July 2006 edit.jpg

Image:Versailles Chapel - July 2006 edit.jpg - not featured

•  Info created by Diliff — uploaded by Fir0002 — nominated by Arad
•  Support I feel I'm inside the building Arad 15:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
•  SupportVery nice --Digon3 20:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I did not see the stitching errors, thanks for pointing that outAngMoKio. --Digon3 16:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to stitching errors K!roman | ☺‼↑♫♥☻ 10:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

   Support K!roman | ☺‼↑♫♥☻ 21:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

•  Support--MichaelMaggs 21:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral super quality sth is wrong with the photo. On the most right and left column there are some distortions visible - most likely because of the stitching --AngMoKio 22:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Roger McLassus 07:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I did not see the stitching errors, but now I do Roger McLassus 15:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome! Erina 09:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Although details are nicely taken, I found a bit distracted by highlights in several areas. Lights in the windows above is definitely overexposed and purple fringings are quite visible. The rightmost pillar is also overexposed. Indon 13:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, by definition it is not overexposed. Check the image:Versailles_Chapel_-_July_2006.jpg. I find it unfortunate, that this flashy edit is presented here rather than Diliff's original. --Dschwen 20:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose this edit, would  Support original. --Wikimol 21:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

banned template replaced Roger McLassus 07:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

•  Info I've noticed the same as AngMoKio: some columns have discontinuities as if the image were a pasting of various components. But I tought that was an artifact of my own computer display. This happens not only with the edited image but also with the original. -- Alvesgaspar 22:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Simonizer 13:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Because of the stitching errors Simonizer 06:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack Wikimol + stitching errors -- Lycaon 13:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose, although this is an impressive and wonderful picture. If the errors can be corrected then they should be. -- Alvesgaspar 15:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Agree --Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 18:01, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Info I'll have a go at re-stitching it and see what I can come up with. stitching pillars out wide is actually pretty difficult from my experience. The tiniest variance between frames will cause them to misalign, whereas slight alignment problems elsewhere in an image are far less obvious. You are right though, it is noticible. Diliff 15:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

5 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 08:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)