User talk:Lmbuga

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Babel
gl
es
pt-2
en-1
Cscr-featured.svgThis user has uploaded 16 featured pictures to Wikimedia Commons.
Quality images logo.svgThis user has uploaded 2736 quality images to Wikimedia Commons.
103,619+This user has made over 103,619 contributions to Wikimedia projects.
60,091+This user has made over 60,091 contributions to Commons.
Noia 64 apps karm.svgThis user has been on Wikimedia Commons for
16 years, 11 months and 10 days
Felicidade A very happy boy.jpg
Conversas arquivadas en User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores.
Conversations archived at User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

08-2011. Panthera tigris tigris - Texas Park - Lanzarote -TP02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 08-2011. Panthera tigris tigris - Texas Park - Lanzarote -TP02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:14, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

En una foto de la Catedral de León.[edit]

Buenas tardes, Luis Miguel: Estoy viendo esta versión de una foto de la catedral de León: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Catedral_de_Le%C3%B3n._Espa%C3%B1a-44.jpg Compruebo que la imagen está distorsionada, aplastada. Las proporciones no son correctas. Al corregir la perspectiva original (con líneas caídas), se produjo esta distorsión de la altura. Así parece como si la catedral tuviese menos elevación. ¿Podrías corregir este efecto? Muchas gracias. --Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 14:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@CARLOS TEIXIDOR CADENAS: : Ahora mismo no puedo. Sí en septiembre o en los útimos días de agosto. En caso de que el resultado no me convenza demasiado, la subo con otro nombre como imagen retocada. Saludos--Lmbuga (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perfecto. Cuando puedas. Una referencia que puede ser muy útil es el reloj de la torre derecha de la catedral. Su esfera es un círculo contenido en un cuadrado perfecto. Ese cuadrado debe tener los cuatro lados iguales. En cambio, en la foto "aplastada" podrás comprobar que los lados verticales son más cortos que los horizontales. Esa es la clave. Muchas gracias.--Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 09:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Detalle dunha parede cuberta con cunchas de vieira. Cambados. Galiza 2021.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detalle dunha parede cuberta con cunchas de vieira. Cambados. Galiza 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2021/2022![edit]

Christmas ball1.svg   * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Lmbuga! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Christmasornaments.png

File:Mineral Bauxita ollos verdes GDFL116.jpg[edit]

Luis Miguel,

I refer to your Wikimedia Commons image File:Mineral Bauxita ollos verdes GDFL116.jpg, which is a bit confusing since it's not an image of bauxite, more probably a variety of gabbro. Perhaps you've mislabelled the image?

regards John beta (talk) 06:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know. mislabelled image.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Banco - Parque Eugenio Granell - Santiago de Compostela 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banco - Parque Eugenio Granell - Santiago de Compostela 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality imo. I like the shallow depth of field. --Ximonic 19:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Lmbuga. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jeff G.: Thanks, but I'm confused, I can't. In addition I have found out that the photos should not be deleted--Lmbuga (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please feel free to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Postal Card of Russia - 2015 - 160 - Mosfilm - IP Dmitriev.png.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baiona lmb.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Río Sar- Parque Eugenio Granell - Santiago de Compostela 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Sar- Parque Eugenio Granell - Santiago de Compostela 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baiona lmb-17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baiona lmb-22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canón no Monte de San Pedro. A Coruña-c3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baiona lmb-26.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tomer T 11:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-35.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baiona lmb-33.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-36.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Illas Canarias. eue455.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. Illas Canarias. eue455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Arco das ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arco das ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Igrexa de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA32.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Arcos das ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcos das ruínas de Santa Mariña Dozo - Cambados-CA14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2022.Garita á par do castelo de San Filipo. F-44.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2022.Garita á par do castelo de San Filipo. F-44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Estatua en contraluz. Ferrol. F-25.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua en contraluz. Ferrol. F-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Cartelo da Palma. 1597. Mugardos. F-37.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cartelo da Palma. 1597. Mugardos. F-37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Caselo da Palma. 1597. Mugardos. F-36.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caselo da Palma. 1597. Mugardos. F-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Camilo Díaz Baliño 1889-1936. Ferrol. F-22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camilo Díaz Baliño 1889-1936. Ferrol. F-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tomer T 16:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Escultura en Ferrol. F-21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura en Ferrol. F-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ferrol. F-6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrol. F-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2022. Castelo de San Filipo. F-40.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2022. Castelo de San Filipo. F-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ferrol. Porto- F-4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrol. Porto- F-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Camilo Díaz Baliño 1889-1936. Ferrol. F-23.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camilo Díaz Baliño 1889-1936. Ferrol. F-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ferrol. Edificio da autoridade portuaria- F-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrol. Edificio da autoridade portuaria- F-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Murallas do Castelo de San Filipo. F-47.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas do Castelo de San Filipo. F-47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tsungam 10:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Parque. Ferrol. F-28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque. Ferrol. F-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Posición dun canón no castelo de San Filipo. F-46.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Posición dun canón no castelo de San Filipo. F-46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tsungam 10:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ferrol. F-11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrol. F-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --aismallard 13:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Estatua en contraluz. Ferrol. F-30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua en contraluz. Ferrol. F-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --aismallard 18:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ferrol. Porto- F-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrol. Porto- F-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ramón Pla y Monge, Marqués de Amboage. Ferrol. F-10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramón Pla y Monge, Marqués de Amboage. Ferrol. F-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Larus michahellis--Lmbuga 23:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ramón Pla y Monge, Marqués de Amboage. Ferrol. F-9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramón Pla y Monge, Marqués de Amboage. Ferrol. F-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Funny photo. I'd suggest adding a category for the gull, but it's up to you. -- Ikan Kekek 21:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Larus michahellis Thank you for the review. More likeable is the previous photo--Lmbuga 22:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Costa de Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. España eue15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Costa de Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. España eue15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Relevo nunha porta en ruínas. Ferrol. F-34.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Relevo nunha porta en ruínas. Ferrol. F-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --aismallard 12:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ruínas. Porta. Ferrol. F-33.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruínas. Porta. Ferrol. F-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --aismallard 12:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruínas da Torre de San Sadurniño. Cambados. Galiza 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --aismallard 12:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Foz. Galiza. eue - 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Foz. Galiza. eue - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please check again this edit because now this photo has only a promotion with no signature. --C messier (talk) 18:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-20-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Hércules - DivesGallaecia2012-20-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Victoriano Sánchez Barcaiztegui. Ferrol. F-20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoriano Sánchez Barcaiztegui. Ferrol. F-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Baiona lmb-16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baiona lmb-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

2022. Castelo de San Filipo. Cheminea. F-41.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2022. Castelo de San Filipo. Cheminea. F-41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Noces Walnuts Nueces.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noces Walnuts Nueces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 13:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lápida. Igrexa de San Pedro Fiz. Catedral. O Incio (1 de 1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lápida. Igrexa de San Pedro Fiz. Catedral. O Incio (1 de 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2022-eue--10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]