Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Wag tail composite downsampled.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Wag tail composite downsampled.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Info I feel this image is good enough for fpc. photographed and uploaded by --Benjamint444 11:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC) - (I am certain, (very certain) that there are no stitching errors)
Support self nom --Benjamint444 11:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)- Support I like it. This time the nom is honest. And I don't see any stitching erros. --Arad 21:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Neutral Pretty cute, the flash reflection in the eyes of the bird spoils it a bit. That and the shadows which are in three different directions. --Atoma 00:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Oppose That, and both tails are cut off. ~ trialsanderrors 00:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)- Oppose ack Trialsanderrors -- Lycaon 05:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose good quality, but it looks unnatural --Simonizer 08:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose looks like a diorama Tbc 12:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose The birds are missing their tails, and the shadows are in three different directions --Digon3 16:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Lestat 16:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I have a hard time supporting a composite image of multiple animals. Part of the information conveyed is how they interact, and it just looks unnatural when they aren't recognizing the others' existence. ShadowHalo 01:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks artificial, and indeed it is. While I wouldn't totally exclude composites as potential FPs, I would expect to see higher quality than this. --MichaelMaggs 15:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose There is an ugly greyish stain coming from the top and passing between the two birds at right, going almost to the bottom, which I suspect it is a stitching "scar". A similar but smaller one is between the birds at left. Alvesgaspar 19:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm glad I got constructive comments this time, It's given me hope that oneday a composite will be promoted. The shadows are all correct as all the shots were taken on the same ledge within an hour or so of each other and I didn't flip any of the images (but I see what you mean - esp. with the one on the right). The grey stain is just a building that is out of focus, I got rid of most of it but it still detracts I suppose. --Benjamint444 03:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
result: 2 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
