Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 13 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:TRAKTOR T40.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Traktor t-40 --Armenak Margarian 20:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
    white balance to a tyre
  • Decline
  •  Comment white balance? --Ralf Roletschek 20:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment i upload new version can you review? --Armenak Margarian 21:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Old one was better, but far away from perfect. White and blue is an hard issue, in winter double twice... --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 21:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ralf. -- Ikan Kekek 06:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Photo contains too many blue and purple elements. I doubt if this repairable by only changing the white-balance because you cannot add yellow and green elements if the original file does not contain those colours. I don't have any idea what went wrong when you took the photo --Michielverbeek 07:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I tried it once ... see on the right --Ralf Roletschek 09:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Ralf, hast du das am Tablet versucht? Nu ist es anders falsch mit kräftigem Farbstich Richtung Cyan. Schnee ohne Sonne darf gerne Richtung Himmelsblau gehen, natürlich nicht lila wie im Original. --Smial 10:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Neee, das war schon der kalibrierte Bildschirm. Mir ist klar,daß auch das nicht richtig stimmt. --Ralf Roletschek 11:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done I upload last version but it's difficult to me to fixed good white balance. Thank you very much for your helps. --Armenak Margarian 19:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Weak  Support now. --Smial 21:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment - The shadows still look bluish/purplish. -- Ikan Kekek 21:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 23:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Innsbruck, toren van der Spitalskirche zum heilige Geist Dm64221 foto4 2017-07-30 19.13.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Innsbruck-Tyrol, churchtower (Spitalskirche zum heilige Geist --Michielverbeek 07:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Bad perspertive, not sharp; sorry.--Marrovi 07:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment It might need a small rotation to the right and sharper is not possible because of the difficult light conditions --Michielverbeek 08:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is a QI to me if you improve the bottom crop (either showing the windows entirely or cropping them out) Poco a poco 10:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks, ✓ Done bottom crop (and a little top+right crop) --Michielverbeek 19:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support although I agree that it could be a bit brigther Poco a poco 16:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Underexposed. Btw: I do not understand the argument with the difficult lighting conditions. Iso250, f/4, 1/250s does not appear to be a night shot, the object is not running away, so it would have been possible to use f/8, iso100, 1/30s or 1/15s. Ok, tripod recommended... --Smial 10:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

 Comment ✓ DoneIt was very dark at that moment, ten minutes after it starts raining like hell; I am not used to those kind of lights conditions and I am not using a tripod during mountainbike trips; I prefer a higher ISO above a higher f-value. I have brighten the clouds because I might exaggerate the darkness just before the heavy weather. --Michielverbeek 13:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC) and --Michielverbeek 17:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 23:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Pholiota aurivella 2017 G2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Golden Scalycap mushroom (2) -- George Chernilevsky 20:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Only a comment, maybee. IMO for me that´s not Quality. It´s overflashed. I like mixed lights and the result of colours, but here it´s really to much flash light. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 20:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Composition isn't ideal, IMO, but so much detail! -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry George, but the hard shadows by direct flash kills it. A simple bouncer would help much. --Smial 10:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Hans-Jürgen and Smial. --Basotxerri 10:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per above Poco a poco 16:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per smial --Trougnouf 10:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 23:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Bolzano (3).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bolzano (Italy).Forest of Bolzano.
    --Marrovi 03:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lack of sharpness, overexposure, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 10:41, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose per Poco. -- Ikan Kekek 07:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco a Poco. I do hope such images don't slip through the net and become QIs, as it would serve to degrade the QI status as a whole.--Peulle 12:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:क्.svg[edit]

  • Nomination Word "k" "क्" in Devanagari script. --Bijay chaurasia 06:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality. --Trougnouf 17:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too simple to me to become QI --Poco a poco 19:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Poco --Ralf Roletschek 09:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A nice contribution to Commons, but too simple to reach official QI status.--Peulle 12:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Halanta_Kha_(ख्)_Devnagari_letter_in_Unicode.svg[edit]

  • Nomination Halanta Kha (ख्) Devnagari letter in Unicode --Bijay chaurasia 06:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too simple to me to become QI --Poco a poco 19:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Poco --Ralf Roletschek 09:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco.--Peulle 12:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Sunset_in_Everglades_National_Park_(18h).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sunset in Everglades National Park (18h), as seen from a chickee (backcountry camping) --Trougnouf 00:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Lack of detail and large blown out areas in the sky. No QI for me. --Milseburg 22:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg.--Peulle 17:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Sunset_in_Everglades_National_Park_(19h).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sunset in Everglades National Park (19h), as seen from a chickee (backcountry camping) --Trougnouf 00:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I disagree. Lots of color noise, not sharp enough, either, and probably also too purple. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your feedback, I applied a slight wavelets denoising filter to remove the color noise without affecting the stars (and cropped the top which I noticed has a noisy line). The purple is what came out of my camera (picture was not edited prior) and I think it looks normal for such a late picture there.Trougnouf 12:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment - The sky is notably better, but the water and vegetation are still far below QI level, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 18:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan. --Basotxerri 12:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Richterhaus_Roßtal.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wohnhaus ehemalig Amtssitz des Richters, Schulstraße 7, Roßtal --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 17:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline The image needs a perspective correction: the walls and windows aren't vertical, especially visible on the left. Could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 18:44, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
    Done - Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  OpposeClouds are overexposed. --Jacek Halicki 21:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Weak support, IMO still acceptable. The top crop results a bit tight after correcting the perspective, too. --Basotxerri 10:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Correction is klling the idea behind the image. The House is height and a dado to show the title of the owner(Circuit Judge). That´s unique. Now it´s private and the white walls are not only fresh, it was wet. That´s the point for white clouds, not now, anyway. I dodged it, but don´t like it.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jacek. I suggest to select the whole sky and add some blue or grey colour.--Ermell 13:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   ----PumpkinSky 23:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Bramsche - Tuchmachermuseum 02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Textile museum in Bramsche, annexe building and Hase river. Osnabrück Land, Lower Saxony, Germany --Basotxerri 18:42, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Those colours can't be right; it looks oversaturated, the WB seems off and I don't think the detail level is very good either. --Peulle 22:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I trust in colours, but here mybee to much contrast for MFT-Chip, Lights in the trees and shadows with small details (wooden window). But White in the shadow must be cold at November! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 14:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sometimes it's question of tastes (and maybe monitor calibration, too). I've desaturated the image a bit, perhaps it was a bit too strong. --Basotxerri 17:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok. --Smial 14:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Improved and PRO --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 14:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok.--Famberhorst 15:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--Marrovi 03:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)