Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 16 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Saint_Mary_church_in_Lich_(4).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Window of the Saint Mary church in Lich, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Shadow can look interesting; but in this picture he bothers me. Not a quality picture in my opinion, but others may think otherwise. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Spurzem; would not have an issue with the shadow if it wouldn't cut the window, which is the subject of the picture, in half. You could try to reduce the effect in raw conversion (reduce highlights, increase shadows, reduce contrast, increase clarity). --Plozessor 06:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support No details hidden by the shadow. --Smial 12:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Hallo Smial, geht es denn inzwischen nur noch darum, dass alle Details zu sehen sind? Wenn ja, dann sind auch die gelegentlich kritisierten Parkplatzbilder hervorragendst. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 14:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 Comment Das ist eine Fehlanalogie. Ich sehe hier keinerlei Gerümpel im Bild (wie auf den Parkplatzbildern) und finde den Schatten halt nicht störend, sondern eher belebend, zumal er eben keine technischen Mängel bewirkt. Wenn du dich am Schatten störst, ist das für mich auch ok. Geschmacksache halt. --Smial 16:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The shadow may prevent an FP status, but I don't see any hindrance for it becoming a QI.--Peulle 08:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support--Jacek Halicki 14:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 16:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Basílica_de_San_Sebastián,_Manila,_Filipinas,_2023-08-27,_DD_08-10_HDR.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Basilica of San Sebastian, Manila, Philippines --Poco a poco 06:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Question What happened to the chandeliers? --Plozessor 07:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version, thanks, I oversaw that --Poco a poco 22:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Unfortunately looking like before to me. Did you upload the wrong file? --Plozessor 06:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I see a difference, the HDR artifacts are gone --Poco a poco 08:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 4 of the chandeliers are still defective in the picture, see the notes I just added. In the current version it's not a QI for me thus I will decline it now, giving you the possibility to move it to discussions. --Plozessor 08:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you that you give that possibility to me, I thought it is everybody's right :) Now seriously, I uploaded a new version, it is better now. --Poco a poco 15:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Per the rules written on top of this page, a picture can be moved to discussions ONLY if it has been declined. Anyway, the chandeliers in your new edit could be acceptable but now the whole picture is too dark. --Plozessor 16:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Reset to "Decline". Please change to "Discuss" if you think there should be more opinions. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Ok, let's move it to CR, I brigthened it also a bit. --Poco a poco 09:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support New version is ok for me. The 4 chandeliers are still not sharp but I think that is acceptable. --Plozessor 06:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support per Plozessor --Sandro Halank 14:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 16:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

File:At_Singapore_2023_052.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Chern Lian Shan: A Visit to the Museum: Taking the Past Forward --Mike Peel 12:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment too dark as it is --Charlesjsharp 09:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for looking, lightened, although it is a dark statue. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:34, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment  Oppose better, but unfortunately a bad day and a lower PoV would be better. Looking down on the people doesn't work for me --Charlesjsharp 08:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for looking again. The day was good, the statue really is this colour, see others in the category. I've done more perspective correction, unfortunately I'm tall with ageing knees. ;-) Maybe worth opening this up for discussion? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Ok for me. --Plozessor 06:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support ok --Sandro Halank 14:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)