Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 21 2021

• 
  • Nomination Illuminated pyramidal roof of the skyscraper Millenia Tower, designed by the architect Kevin Roche, at night in Singapore. --Basile Morin 04:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the lobby coffee and drinks with glass chandeliers at The Fullerton Bay Hotel, Singapore. --Basile Morin 04:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the Tokyo International Forum glass building with roller shades, in the main hall with transparent roof and interior footbridges, view from the 7th floor, Tokyo, Japan. Designed by architect Rafael Viñoly and completed in 1996, the building features swooping curves of steel truss and glass. The outside is shaped like an elongated boat. --Basile Morin 04:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Illuminated street corner at blue hour, facade of the building Fujiya, colorful neon street signs, intersection of the streets Harumi dori and Sotobori dori, Ginza, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. --Basile Morin 04:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Water reflection of a green island in the Mekong at sunrise with blue sky, white cloud and running pirogue, in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 04:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Münsterstraße (inward) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Halterner Straße, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of the St Viktor church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trees at Silbersee III in Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arcades at the Prinzipalmarkt in the Advent season, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartement building on 10. Oktober Strasse #23, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New apartment building on 10. Oktober Straße #35, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Strandschlössl on Karlstraße #14, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inscription on top of the Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maison Maizerets --Wilfredor 00:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But please improve the filename. --XRay 04:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maison Maizerets --Wilfredor 00:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Please improve the filename. "Photographs of" isn't a good choice. --XRay 04:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Université Laval, Quebec --Wilfredor 00:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relique dans Église Saint-Charles --Wilfredor 00:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relique dans Église Saint-Charles --Wilfredor 00:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lantern in Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flag of Colombia in Castillo San Felipe de Barajas, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 00:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Das Karasek-Museum in Seifhennersdorf --Nightflyer 21:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose too soft IMHO --Ezarate 21:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winter on the Kreuzberg in the Rhön Mountains --Milseburg 20:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful --Michielverbeek 20:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutschland, Erden an der Mosel, Hauptstraße 12 --Berthold Werner 17:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weißstörche im dreier Pack im Naturschutzgebiet Lochbusch-Königswiesen, Haßloch, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 16:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Funny shot, maybe a bit oversharpened.. --Palauenc05 17:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sonia Mann at Farmers' Protest (15th February 2021) --Satdeep Gill 16:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good shot. Maybe you should add a category for a portrait of a woman. -- Ikan Kekek 17:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eliomys quercinus beim Reinigen der Pfoten. --Fentriss 15:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Top of the Bischofsschloss in Leuk in February 2021. --Espandero 15:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pfyn-Finges Park as seen from Leuk in February 2021. --Espandero 15:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Demolished window of former locomotive repair shop in Trier. --Palauenc05 12:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Helena statue at spring house (1909) in Trier. --Palauenc05 12:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sand quarry in Tambov, Russia. --Саня Новиков 12:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Hoëgne river, from the bridge on Sentier de la Hoëgne, between Bois Domanial de la Hoëgne and Bois Communal de la Hoëgne (Jalhay, High Fens – Eifel Nature Park, Belgium) --Trougnouf 10:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main hallway inside an abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse (Liège, Belgium) --Trougnouf 10:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Place de l'Église rénovée et l'église de Neyron en février 2021. --Benoît Prieur 10:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olive orchards near Córdoba, Spain. --Kallerna 10:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowering daffodils in the Begijnhof in Bruges --Ermell 08:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Field at the Michelsberg Forest near Bischberg --Ermell 08:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quarry in Buch-Bischwind in the district of Haßberge --Ermell 08:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crane Gate and Long Bridge in Gdansk --Ermell 08:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Myocastor coypus --PROPOLI87 08:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 08:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arnhem-Meinerswijk NL, the southern lake with high water and ice --Michielverbeek 07:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arnhem-Meinerswijk NL, tree with high water during frost period --Michielverbeek 07:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arnhem-Meinerswijk NL, tree with high water during frost period --Michielverbeek 07:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Turret of the castle of Vézins-de-Lévézou, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at 54 Place du Faubourg in Najac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Onet-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Facade of the chapel of the Lille Catholic University, Boulevard Vauban, Lille, France --Velvet 07:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower buds of Eranthis hyemalis in melting snow. Focus stack of 29 photos.
    --Famberhorst 06:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Beautiful! --Tournasol7 07:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Rock snail, Reishia clavigera --Llez 05:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Solitary Pinus sylvestris on a rough heathland. Location: Koninklijke Houtvesterij Het Loo.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The California State Capitol in Sacramento during blue hour on February 17, 2021. --Frank Schulenburg 04:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden sculpture “Lady chapel” (Peter Bolle, 2011) in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heilig Geist Foundation retirement home in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Münsterstraße (inward) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance portal of the St Viktor church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Outstanding! --Frank Schulenburg 05:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sythener Hellweg near the Silbersee III near Sythen, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 6 Rue Gaston Maruéjols in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 02:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris 7e Hôtel de Villars (by GFreihalter) --Sebring12Hrs 02:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris Piscine Lutetia (by GFreihalter) --Sebring12Hrs 02:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support A little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay 07:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris 8e Boulevard Malesherbes 86 (by GFreihalter) --Sebring12Hrs 02:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maison MaizeretsThis --Wilfredor 00:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argiope lobata, female --Christian Ferrer 17:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kallerna 22:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside cross (1834) in Trier-Euren. --Palauenc05 18:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination In the 1800s, Banamali Roy Bahadur the Landlord of Pabna established the Tarash Bhavan.This image was selected as picture of the day on Bengali Wikipedia.I, the copyright holder of this work. --Nafiur Rahman 11:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please eliminate the purple chromatic aberration from the branches on the upper left and fix the COM:OVERCAT. -- Ikan Kekek 15:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
     Comment Ikan Kekek Done. --Nafiur Rahman 07:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
    Thanks.  Support Good quality and a nice subject. -- Ikan Kekek 09:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Demonstration racing during motor show in Sokolniki Park (Moscow, Russia) --LexKurochkin 21:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn OK. --A.Savin 23:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination Sorry, thanks for the promotion, but on the second thought I see, that I am not happy with the image quality. I will reprocess it from raw. --LexKurochkin 09:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Université Laval, Quebec --Wilfredor 20:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Loh Dalum beach in Ko Phi Phi Don in Krabi Province, Thailand. --Tournasol7 07:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carreau du Temple (by Carreau du Temple) --Sebring12Hrs 03:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "À tous les Français" plaque next to Charenton-le-Pont courthouse, France. --Chabe01 02:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tykha Bay in Crimea. By User:Vian --Anntinomy 11:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
    strong vigneting and overexposition --Wilfredor 21:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eclectic house, Rue Saint Gabriel 53, Lille, France --Velvet 07:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic of interstate A29 bridge over Hunte river in Oldenburg, Germany. --Jacek79 20:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I can see color noise and CAs, could you fix it? --Tesla Delacroix 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
    Reduced the magenty and cyan channels slightly. Better now? --Jacek79 20:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Hevy destortion due to the projektion --Milseburg 20:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
    I can still detect CAs and strong color noise at the steel structures --Tesla Delacroix 11:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
     Done Reworked. It must be OK now. --Jacek79 21:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
    I am very sorry! The image itself is definitely very sharp and will be a QI, but there is still strong color noise in the sky and at the concrete etc. Do you use Lightroom? There is an easy way to remove this with Lightroom. --Tesla Delacroix 23:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
    added an image note --Tesla Delacroix 08:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
     DoneI removed the reddish noise in the central part of the bridge. Should be sufficient now. --Jacek79 19:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. I can see some noise at full-resolution but it's not apparent at full height on a 4K monitor. Note that it's better to do (profiled) denoising before exporting (with higher bit depth) to hugin. --Trougnouf 09:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chehel Sotoun, Isfahan, Iran :This is a photo of a monument in Iran identified by the IDThis image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020. --Amirpashaei 07:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Review Beautiful. Please add relevant categories and geocoordinates. -- Ikan Kekek 10:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
    I added. Thanks. --Amirpashaei 10:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
    Now it's COM:OVERCAT and there's a red-linked category. Please include only non-duplicative blue-linked categories, or I can edit them for you if you like. -- Ikan Kekek 12:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque, Isfahan, IranThis is a photo of a monument in Iran :This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020. --Amirpashaei 07:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Splendid. Please add relevant categories and geocoordinates. -- Ikan Kekek 09:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
    I added. Thanks. --Amirpashaei 10:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
     Comment Same remark as on the other photo. "Building interiors" is a parent category of "Dome interiors", and the red-linked category should be removed. -- Ikan Kekek 12:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. I removed the COM:OVERCAT --Trougnouf 09:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque, Isfahan, IranThis is a photo of a monument in Iran :This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020. --Amirpashaei 07:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I added. Thanks. --Amirpashaei 10:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
     Support Very nice. I removed the COM:OVERCAT --Trougnouf 09:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Stream_in_Sarek_National_Park_(DSCF2597).jpg

• Nomination Stream in Sarek National Park, along the Kungsleden --Trougnouf 08:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose chromatic aberration --Liridon 14:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
• Fixed CA removed --Trougnouf 17:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --LexKurochkin 12:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 17:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality -- Basile Morin 01:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 21:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Горганські_цекоти.jpg

• Nomination Gorgany Nature Reserve. By User:Тарас Піц --Anntinomy 22:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment I set this to discussion to get a second opinion. For me the DOF is okay here, but it looks a little oversaturated --Tesla Delacroix 20:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support This is my second opinion but I don't see a first opinion --Moroder 09:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support saturation is o.k. for me --Ermell 19:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg (talk) 21:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Brescia_castello_torre_dei_Prigionieri_panorama_di_Brescia.jpg

• Nomination Tower of prisoners and view of Brescia from in the Castle. --Moroder 07:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose null --Wilfredor 23:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  the sky look satured --Wilfredor 23:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment That was the color that day--Moroder 08:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok I put it to discuss to see others opinions --Wilfredor 13:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Moroder, I'd defer to you on the sky in general, but there's a bit of a diffuse halo around the tower, easily visible at smaller resolutions. -- Ikan Kekek 17:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --in spite of sky, which looks a bit artificial KaiBorgeest 22:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan, even at higher resolutions. --Trougnouf 13:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 21:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Білий_ліс.jpg

• Nomination Synevyr National Nature Park. By User:Пивовар Павло --Anntinomy 22:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Impressive --Palauenc05 23:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The WB needs to be corrected --Uoaei1 06:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Neutral I'm not sure about WB. It may be correct if it's Golden hour. --XRay 08:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support When the sun is very low, it can look like this--Ermell 19:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Ermell --LexKurochkin 21:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 21:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Photographs_of_Église_Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin,_Québec,_Canada_02.jpg

• Nomination Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin --Wilfredor 23:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportGood quality. --Pudelek 20:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. DoF is too shallow, even pages are partly blurred. The only sharp object is a bookstand. If this image was named and cathegorized as about bookstand I would agree, but the church is completely out of focus. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 06:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment the out of focus of the church is done on purpose to emphasize the importance of the main subject --Wilfredor 15:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality per above explanation. -- Ikan Kekek 09:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment OK, but in this case IMO it needs different categorization and better description. --LexKurochkin 14:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@LexKurochkin:  Done Thanks --Wilfredor 04:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I withdraw my objection. Thank you. --LexKurochkin 10:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Please check (and improve) the filename. I don't think a filename beginning with "Photographs of" is a good name for a single photograph. --XRay 07:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 21:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Col._Hugh_B._and_Helen_Moore_House.jpg

• Nomination The Colonel Hugh B. and Helen Moore House --Jim Evans 22:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
• Decline  Comment Fixed sky.
   Oppose Insufficient quality. sky Overexposed --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
   Question I'm not sure what you mean by overexposed? It was a white sky. -- ~~~~
   Support IMO irrelevant --Moroder 15:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks OK, except what are the light gray smudges to the right of the house? -- Ikan Kekek 09:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose highlights burnt.--Ermell 19:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 21:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Brescia_Castello_baluardo_San_Marco_mastio_Visconteo.jpg

• Nomination Bastion of Saint Mark and Visconti Bergfried in the the Castle of Brescia. --Moroder 22:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Insufficient quality. harsh contrast --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
   Comment That was exactly the light that day. I actually reduced the contrast lighting up the dark parts. --Moroder 08:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose harsh light. --Kallerna 10:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Very good photo to me. You're going to trash it because it's bright, when nothing looks blown? Are you getting too blase about photos that are large to huge and good to very good? -- Ikan Kekek 12:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment The photo shows some bright areas clipping in the red channel, so it is a little bit overexposed. The frontal lighting would certainly prevent it from getting the FPC medal, but it's good enough for QIC. I would support a version with half a stop less exposure without colour shifts in the bright areas. --Smial 23:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Smial: Thanks for the comment. This is the histogram File:Bildschirmfoto 2021-02-13 um 06.37.03.png I don't see any overexposure --Moroder 05:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Comment I do. Never rely on histograms that cover the entire photo. Histograms are generally only a very rough measuring instrument and only suitable for a quick, approximate estimate. --Smial 00:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Imo this tipe of peeping goes far beyond guidelines and discourages people to post on QIC, but even to collaborate with Wikimedia :-( --Moroder 09:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

• I won't take your objection as a personal attack. You wanted to prove with a histogram that the picture is not overexposed. I have explained absolutely objectively what I consider to be the cause of this slight overexposure. That was an attempt to explain to you and possibly others where a technical error is and how to find it. I did not look at individual pixels at all. If you reproach me for this attempt to help you, I don't understand what the point of QIC is, except to get as many trophies as possible for an exclusive group of participants. --Smial 22:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

• Actually I didn't intend it as a personal attack and I'm glad you didn't feel it like that. It was meant in general to some reviewers which look for irrelevant flaws that every photo has. I guess those are errors which are inevitable, even if you work a lot on your image. I like QIC because actually many reviewers like you are helpful to improve the photographic technique and to correct some errors, but that should not be a reason for declining the QI mark, since the main reason why I put pictures on QIC is to give them a quality sign to be published or selected more easily for the articles on WP. I feel that QIC guidelines are correct in promoting quality and fortunately are not as strict to allow also images which are only good and have irrelevant flaws to be promoted and to encourage more participants other than the "exclusive group". Cheers --Moroder 14:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

• I distinguish between avoidable image defects and those that are unavoidable or can only be improved to a limited extent for technical or physical, sometimes also aesthetic reasons. --Smial 16:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Harsh sunlight is natural at noon time in Italy! Good quality. --Tagooty 09:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 19:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 17:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 21:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Villa_neoclassica_in_Viale_Venezia_Brescia.jpg

• Nomination Neoclassical villa on Viale Venezia in Brescia. --Moroder 22:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Insufficient quality. trees disturbing and harsh contrast --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  I tried to cut some trees. That was exactly the light that day. I actually reduced the contrast lighting up the dark parts. --Moroder 08:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose harsh light. --Kallerna 10:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Pleasant light and shadows to me, the branches don't spoil the photo and the quality is very high. -- Ikan Kekek 12:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan Kekek, 36 Mo, good light, trees are not a problem --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC) PS : Don't forget to open the picture in full screen.
•  Support Again slight overexposure, but in this case not really disturbing. -- Smial 23:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Tagooty 10:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 17:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 21:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Brescia_castello_torre_dei_Francesi_panorama_di_Brescia.jpg

• Nomination Tower of the French and view of Brescia from in the Castle. --Moroder 22:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Insufficient quality. Harsh contrast and left bottom corner is almost black --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
   Comment What is the problem. You can see every detail and it's the northern face of the fortress --Moroder 08:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC) --Moroder 08:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose harsh light. --Kallerna 10:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I have to say the blurry black shadow in the lower left corner is bothersome. I'd recommend making a horizontal crop above it. Would you consider that, Moroder? The rest is a very nice composition and very high-quality. -- Ikan Kekek 12:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks Ikan, I was not aware of that shadow on the left --Moroder 12:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Thanks.  Support -- Ikan Kekek 13:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
• Weak  Support, again exposure on the high side with some colour channel clipping. Ansonsten sehr gut. --Smial 23:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 17:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 21:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Ruf_de_Gherdëina_Derjon_stil_Urtijëi.jpg

• Nomination The Derjon river in Urtijëi, Gröden. --Moroder 22:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Insufficient quality. Oversharpening and top branches are blurred --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
   Comment With high resolution photos there are always less focused parts, that is photography, unless you do focus stacking. But not even than. --Moroder 08:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Fix the purple CA on the branches in the upper right and then I will support. -- Ikan Kekek 12:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Done Thank you --Moroder 16:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 19:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blurred trees in top left --Tagooty 10:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan--Ermell 19:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
•  weak support --Commonists 17:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 21:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

File:White_throat_Kingfisher_Uthandi_TN_Feb21_D72_19860.jpg

• Nomination White-throated kingfisher (Halcyon smyrnensis), Uthandi, TN, India. --Tagooty 09:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. beak in focus, not the head --Charlesjsharp 17:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support sharp enough to be printed to A4 size or even larger. --Smial 23:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H 10:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 18:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Geoprofi Lars 13:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles --Milseburg 14:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The head is unsharp. --A.Savin 02:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles --LexKurochkin 14:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Tesla Delacroix 20:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles --Ermell 08:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Support No FP, but good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 22:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 21:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)