Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 20 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Schwedenbrücke_und_Taborstraße.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Schwedenbrücke and Taborstraße, Vienna, Austria --Dmottl 10:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment These two buildings, one on each side, are definitely leaning in. What I'm not sure of is if this is camera/lens perspective distortion or an optical illusion. Inviting other reviewers. PumpkinSky 13:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support All but two buildings are straight. The right one goes wider upwards (you can see it on the windows on the left handside). The left building widens upwards, too. Check here, and again, compare the windows. Ralf shot these buildings, too, he might confirm it. --Basotxerri 17:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I have never been in Vienna, but I think it is a brilliant optical illusion. The verticals to which you have to look to are straight. --Michielverbeek 22:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Baso is right, the buildings get wider at the top; which is interesting because it'd make them top heavy. PumpkinSky 23:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Both are leaning in (by design). One is Hans Hollein 2001 (Media Tower, Vienna), the other one is Jean Nouvel 2010 (Uniqa Nouvel Tower). I believe this should be added for QI. Also see de:Taborstraße#Bauten --Thomas Ledl 08:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 22:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Fragment_d'hydrie_apulienne_–_MSR_–_Rituels_Grecs_–_inv_HC_284.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fragment of Apulian hydra – Exposition Rituels Grecs in Saint-Raymond museum, Toulouse, France. --Ruthven 21:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --PumpkinSky 23:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. First of all, size under 2MB. Then bad light (but right WA) and no details in surface. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 04:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 Info It doesn't have to be 2MB, it has to be 2 megapixels, which it easily meets. PumpkinSky 04:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Smial 11:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 22:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Dark_wanderer_(Pareronia_ceylanica_pingasa)_male.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Dark wanderer (Pareronia ceylanica pingasa) male, Kerala, India --Charlesjsharp 10:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose I personally don't think this is sharp enough for QI, sorry. --Peulle 11:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I think it is really close to the line. --RaboKarbakian 15:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very good composition and nice lighting, but really somewhat too soft. Also some posterization in the background. --Smial 11:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 22:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Under_Crook_Point_Bascule_Bridge_(62393)a.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Graffiti under the Crook Point Bascule Bridge in Providence, RI. --Rhododendrites 21:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose IMO the focal point is too much in front, the bridge itself gets already somewhat unsharp. Maybe it's a limit case, so move this to CR if you want but remove the CAs before doing so, please. BTW, did you shoot this with a vintage or manual lens? --Basotxerri 07:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version uploaded (removing some CA). It's fair to characterize this one as an edge case, so sending to CR to see what happens. :) The lens is indeed manual focus. this one. Do you ask because it's missing from EXIF? Rhododendrites 15:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes, because of the EXIF data. And by interest as I shoot with MFTs, too. --Basotxerri 17:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 08:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  weak support - The big rock is in focus but the bridge is a little iffy. PumpkinSky 19:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 22:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)