Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 16 2013
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Brachylophus fasciatus --Holleday 11:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. -- Felix Koenig 12:18, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Saint Margareth church in Obervöls. --Moroder 08:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 09:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 43304 at Gloucester. Mattbuck 08:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but blurred on right (trees) --High Contrast 11:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 43308 at Peterborough. Mattbuck 08:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion A good one. Thanks for contributing it --High Contrast 11:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo Soranzo (Venice)--Archaeodontosaurus 06:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. The tree could be complete though, given the quantity of pavement. --Coyau 06:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers of a Digitalis ferruginea -- Alvesgaspar 23:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me --Llez 05:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Alde Feanen.Direction bird observation hut.--
Famberhorst 15:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC) - Promotion OK Support --Christian Ferrer 05:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination The Alde Feanen.Direction bird observation hut.--
-
- Nomination Brimham Rocks. Mattbuck 10:48, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion OK Support --Christian Ferrer 05:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance of passage du Grand-Cerf as seen from rue Saint-Denis, Paris, 2nd arr., France. --JLPC 17:21, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion The top is blurred and I'm not sure about the perspectives but it's not easy with old buldings --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
New cropped file uploaded. --JLPC 20:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC) OK Support --Christian Ferrer 05:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The Panum Institute, the main building of the medical faculty of the University of Copenhagen. --Bob Collowân 12:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Die Kassierer beim Ruhrpott Rodeo 2013 in Hünxe. Wolfgang Wendland (Gesang) --Smial 10:06, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Do not enter sign, Nußdorf ob der Traisen. --Herzi Pinki 07:21, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A wayside shrine at Nußdorf ob der Traisen / Franzhausen, Lower Austria. --Herzi Pinki 07:21, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Golden Hour at Emerald Bay, Lake Tahoe. --Frank Schulenburg 05:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Harmfull butterfly of the palm trees. -- Dvillafruela 05:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Panorama of Montepulciano --Martin Falbisoner 04:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Manuel Antonio by Ramón Conde. Rianxo, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 23:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Rjcastillo 01:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boats, port of Rianxo, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 23:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Rjcastillo 01:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graveyard of Averbode abbey, Belgium -- MJJR 21:08, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers of a Beauty Bush (Kolkwitzia amabilis) -- Alvesgaspar 21:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Kraft 21:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Retable in the Saint Margareth church in Obervöls. --Moroder 19:05, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angelika Kirchschlager and Michael Schade with the Philharmonia Schrammeln Wien - opening evening of the Vienna Festival 2013 at the square in front of the Rathaus in Vienna, Austria. Image taken by Tsui. --Smial 19:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Several zombie pixels, and not much fine detail I'm afraid. --Mattbuck 20:59, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Royal lily (Lilium regale), inflorescence, in a garden, France. --JLPC 17:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good --Rjcastillo 22:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Polychromed statue of Virgin Mary in a wayside shrine in Völs am Schlern --Moroder 16:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine with a polychromed statue of Virgin Mary in Völs am Schlern --Moroder 16:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion OK Support --Christian Ferrer 17:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination François Maillol Embankment, Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 16:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Langør Church --Villy Fink Isaksen 10:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, though somewhat underxposed. --Smial 21:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marma Military camp (cultural heritage), Sweden.--V-wolf 06:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Comment Very good, but needs some tilt & shift. -- Smial 07:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Done (I think) V-wolf 14:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC) - Promotion Ok now, but, uh, oh FOUR attempts? Do You use Windows? Have a look at de:ShiftN (freeware), which is very easy to use. --Smial 18:26, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination Marma Military camp (cultural heritage), Sweden.--V-wolf 06:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Cultural heritage monument Gasthof Göttler in Trudering, Munich. --High Contrast 20:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Smial 21:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination the Fernsehturm Berlin, the Park Inn Hotel and St. Mary's Church, Berlin at night --Leviathan1983 18:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Smial 21:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cadavedo Beach (Spain) --Adbar 00:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Corbeille oasis in Nafta (improved version: perspective and contrast) --Adbar 00:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Castle of Schwerin, Detail --Ralf Roletschek 20:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Comment The background is blurred on the left side, it is hard to see why at 1/320s --Adbar 0:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Per Adbar - blurry, overexposed. Mattbuck 20:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurocopter EC 665 Tiger UHT cockpit. --Julian Herzog 08:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion I thought that was just a fake from Goldeneye... --Mattbuck 20:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vieussan, Hérault, France. Haut-Languedoc Regional Natural Park. --Christian Ferrer 11:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Halo on the ridgeline to the right. Mattbuck 15:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)New version uploaded, I've tried to improve it, but I don't know about the result, general quality is a bit low. If you're uncertain please decline, I prefear no QI than bad QI --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Much better. Mattbuck 20:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hills and vineyards from the Col du Bac. Roquebrun, Hérault, France. Haut-Languedoc Regional Natural Park. Haut-Languedoc Regional Natural Park. --Christian Ferrer 19:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Just about ok. --Mattbuck 17:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the lost time, I'm sometime going too fast with my nominations --Christian Ferrer 17:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hills and vineyards from the Col du Bac. Roquebrun, Hérault, France. Haut-Languedoc Regional Natural Park. Haut-Languedoc Regional Natural Park. --Christian Ferrer 19:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Not sold on this - focus appears to be middle-distance, but foreground is distracting. Mattbuck 17:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the lost time, I'm sometime going too fast with my nominations --Christian Ferrer 17:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Jubilee Campus MMB 42.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Water reflections on Jubilee Campus. Mattbuck 21:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Decline Lack of clarity and numerous image errors. --Steindy 22:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Those are not "image errors", they're things floating in the water, and, in one case, a reflection! You're being ridiculous. Mattbuck 23:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
:And why do you remove my image notes? These may not see another user? --Steindy 23:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC))
Oppose too much noisy IMO. --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Oppose As Christian Ferrer and CAs (see notes). It seems, IMO, not natural: a bit posterized?--Lmbuga 18:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)- It was an oddly lit day, but ok. Mattbuck 18:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Isartor_Panorama,_Múnich,_Alemania.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Isartor, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 20:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Good picture, but in my opinion, to be QI, the shadow is disturbing--Lmbuga 01:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
OK for me. Mattbuck 21:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC) - Support Good Quality for me --Rjcastillo 12:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support – proper work. -- Felix Koenig 13:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Weak support--Lmbuga 21:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
File:13-06-07_RaR_Amon_Amarth_Johan_Hegg_09.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Johan Hegg of Amon Amarth at Rock am Ring 2013 -- Achim Raschka 05:51, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion The proportions of the image are unhappy. The haed is okay, but the other parts of the photo are out of focus. --Vassil 20:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- OK for me. Mattbuck 21:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Smial 12:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 12:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Felix Koenig 13:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Budapest_Hungary_08.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Budapest Hungary --The Photographer 03:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Tilted and could use sharpening. Mattbuck 18:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
to me its QI. --Ralf Roletschek 20:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version that should fix the minor problems of this QI, that it was even before my contribution.--Hic et nunc 14:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
New version is better. Mattbuck 17:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Evangelische_Akademie_Tutzing_-_See_-_Sitzgruppen_003.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The palace garden of the Evangelische Akademie Tutzing in Tutzing. Pergola with furniture. --Mummelgrummel 14:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose harsh contrast, blown sky --A.Savin 17:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- blown sky - yes. but the main object is good, for me Support QI. --Ralf Roletschek 19:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support - ok to me. Mattbuck 17:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? A.Savin 16:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Trifolium_hybridum_-_roosa_(rootsi)_ristik.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Alsike clover (Trifolium hybridum). --Iifar 19:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment The flower of the midle is blurry or not sharp. There isn't nothing realy sharp (or significative IMO) in the low area of the image. The flower of the top (very good but with a bit of noise) is perhaps too little to crop it--Lmbuga 19:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Why does everything have to be sharp? The flower and some leafs are sharp. And I want to show the shape of the plant. --Iifar 07:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Support In a macro pic not everything can be sharp. Good quality IMO. --Jastrow 08:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, the question is not if it's more or less sharp, IMO. The question is if it can be better and what is QI. For me, can be better and with a 5% (or 10%) of the image sharp, it's not QI because this image can be better. But it's only my opinion and I can understand your opinion. No problem if you are right and I'm not. The situation seems important for future decisions: Insects... Sorry, I'm learning always--Lmbuga 18:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- To substantiate my vote: the pic was taken at f/11 and 105 mm on a Nikon APS-C SLR. The EXIF don't mention the distance, but I think it's pretty close. Let's say 80 cm. That's 2.3 cm of DoF. Stopping down one or two stops gets you diffraction but not much more DoF. I agree the crop could be a bit tighter, but it's a matter of taste. Still a good macro pic in my book. --Jastrow 20:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- Question could allow something else in focus if a slight change of perspective or of camera tilt... or the choice of another subject?--Lmbuga 11:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- To substantiate my vote: the pic was taken at f/11 and 105 mm on a Nikon APS-C SLR. The EXIF don't mention the distance, but I think it's pretty close. Let's say 80 cm. That's 2.3 cm of DoF. Stopping down one or two stops gets you diffraction but not much more DoF. I agree the crop could be a bit tighter, but it's a matter of taste. Still a good macro pic in my book. --Jastrow 20:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Marma läger 07.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Marma military camp (cultural heritage), Sweden.--V-wolf 20:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Good quality. --JLPC 16:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
imho the sky is overexposed and looks strange (look also at the leafs). --Tuxyso 19:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination V-wolf 06:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)