Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 03 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Saltwater_Crocodiles_of_Sundarbans_09.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice shot, but IMO unsharp and low details. --XRay 08:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose well composed but slightly out of focus plus artefacts on teeth and eye. --Virtual-Pano 08:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 16:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Western_façade_of_the_Château_de_Villandry.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Western façade of the Château de Villandry --Ввласенко 21:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Wait, is this man on the pinnacles aiming with a crossbow against the photographer? What are we about to witness? It seems to me, like the perspective isn't right here, and correcting it would make little sense, since you uploaded files like File:Château de Villandry from the southwest.jpg that are way more accurate and would fit a QI better. Just my opinion. --Der Angemeldete 13:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Sorry, but I don't see crossbow or errors of perspective. Yes, there are a lot of photos of Villandry uploaded, maybe we should stop taking pictures of Villandry? -- Ввласенко 09:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
      •  Comment Or we should make the rights ones QI. Just saying. --Der Angemeldete 00:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Info It looks not like a crossbow to me, but something like a rod as a barrier and the man behind it holding something unspectacular :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Between the teeth are cross beams for safety.-- Ввласенко 20:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose man, the joke became even funnier -.- But ok, let's make this pictures with bad perspective all QI. --Der Angemeldete 08:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lacking detail in the roofs, etc. --Tagooty 04:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me.--Ermell 10:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit lack of sharpness, but the compo is very good. --Sebring12Hrs 06:18, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Tagooty.--Peulle 12:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good composition, but the picture could have been better though. Also Id suggest fixing the perspective. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment The image composition should be improved. The roses on the right too much space above the building, change camera position in relation to the ground, higher or further to the left, and a little more space for the top of the tower. --Mister rf 19:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose besides the lack of detail the crop is not working for me --Virtual-Pano 11:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 16:08, 2 March 2023 (UTC)