Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 20 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Ida Paul - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Finnish musician Ida Paul performing. --Teevee 21:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Ok for me. --Tournasol7 23:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Good photo indeed, but images with watermarks, such as this has on the lower left corner, are per se ineligible for consideration for QI. If you'd like to delete your email address from the photo, please go ahead and resubmit. -- Ikan Kekek 01:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan, sorry. Good photo. --Smial 09:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Ouch! This is embarrassing. I had accidentally put the watermark on 23 photos. All those photos have been re-uploaded without the watermark. --Teevee 15:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good now. --Basotxerri 21:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Not only a QI, but possibly an FP (someone might nitpick about the very slight crop to the guitar in FPC, but it could be worth a nomination). -- Ikan Kekek 21:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ikan ;-) Give it a try at FP. --Smial 22:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Billy69150 10:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Ναός_Αγίου_Παντελεήμονα,_Μπιτζαριανό_1575.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Church of Panteleimon, Bitzariano, Crete --C messier 12:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Wrong camera setting. Why use f/5.6 with exposure time 1/640 on a still, daylight photo? Sorry --Moroder 16:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment I don't understand the decline (it isn't mentioned in which criterium the photo fails). The camera settings are such so as to expose both highlights and the shadows without blowing or extensive noise. F/5.6 is the sweet spot of m4/3 lenses. --C messier 21:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
      •  Comment Imo In full sunlight there is only one plane in focus --Moroder 07:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 09:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • weak  Support - the path looks a bit unsharp, but main object is in focus, the sky is nice. It's ok to me -- DerFussi 21:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst 18:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Billy69150 10:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Vierzehnheiligen_Kloster_Eingang_3070575.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Entrance portal to the monastery building in Vierzehnheiligen --Ermell 07:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I'm sorry, but I oppose, at least for now, as the sculptures on top look almost as if they're motion blurred, but this building is stationary. -- Ikan Kekek 09:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment That's what happens when you correct the perspective in wide-angle shots. Here is the improved issue. --Ermell 07:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Thanks, much better. -- Ikan Kekek 20:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Billy69150 10:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)