Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 02 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:1GB_DDR1_400Mhz_(9).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 1GB DDR1 400Mhz RAM module. --Ryse93 12:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, it's overexposed, the depth of field for a product shot like this is too narrow, and it's oversharpened. --Zinnmann 12:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
    I have upload new version. --Ryse93 12:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
     Support Better now. Pro. --Zinnmann 21:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Weird colours. Mixed lighting. --Smial 15:51, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Mixed lighting, details not sufficient. --Tagooty 04:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Church_of_St_Elisabeth_the_New_Martyr_from_the_south_2.jpg[edit]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:24, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2020-11-21_Rennrodeln,_Deutsche_Meisterschaften_in_Königssee_1DX_4822_by_Stepro.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Luge, Deutsche Meisterschaften in Königssee: Norbert Loch (German Head coach). --Stepro 08:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Good quality, Unfortunately the tassel is cut off. --Steindy 08:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support And if you include all the tassel and some space so its not super tight, the face will be too far. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good portrait. -- Ikan Kekek 01:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose the tassel is cut off. SHB2000 04:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Andrew. --Smial 17:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Steindy and SHB2000 --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support really good quality. absolutly enough for QI --Geoprofi Lars 11:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Muttukadu_Boat_House_Tamilnadu_Aug21_D72_20693-94.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Muttukadu Boat House (panorama), from the ECR bridge, Tamilnadu, India --Tagooty 03:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough. --Steindy 09:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • I request other opinions, please. --Tagooty 15:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 06:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I would prefer it if the centre of the focus range was on the building rather than the plants in the f/g, but to me it's adequate for QI. Rodhullandemu 12:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The sharpness isn't great, the buildings are leaning to the left. All in all no QI. --Zinnmann 12:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  • @Zinnmann: @Steindy: Pl. see new version with tilt corrected and sharpness improved. --Tagooty 03:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
  • @Tagooty: Sorry no! The sharpness of the photo has got worse rather than better. -Steindy 21:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree to Zinnmann and Steindy, it is to unsharp for QI. Geoprofi Lars 11:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Verticals are okay, but sharpness isn't there. --A.Savin 12:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)