SRSLY? Partly obscured by vegetation and lower resolution? I nearly fell off the ladder getting this so there's no way I'm trying again at my age. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question How old are you? Anyway, you are right to be careful with that ladder. But to be serious, this is better as far as quality is concerned, however I'd like to know if the plaque is circular or oval. --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 67, except for some parts. The plaque is meant to be circular, so the ladder was to minimise parallex error. I find if you try and correct it in Photoshop the lettering sometimes looks weird. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My feeling is that the text is the most important thing, and the other photo lacks glare, so the text is much easier to read. Palauenc05, those JPEG artifacts you see - do you see them at review size? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support After the correction this image is the better one of two. Further it seems useful and is used. The leafs in the other image disturb. -- Spurzem (talk) 11:40, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
