Commons:Valued image candidates/Basilica dei Santi Felice e Fortunato (Vicenza) - interior - Choir.jpg

Basilica dei Santi Felice e Fortunato (Vicenza) - interior - Choir.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-09-14 05:09 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: The interior of the Basilica Santi Felice e Fortunato in Vicenza - Fresco of the ceiling of the choir
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Not noisy but very distorted and partially overexposed. For me it would not be a valued image. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC) There is no distortion, there is no overexposed area. we have control software for these two points; Your assertion is a story. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC) Look at the windows and at the lower middle part of the big painting than you see the overexposed areas. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC) Objective measures contradict your lie. Your bad faith is visible to all. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)  Support It is best in scope. VIC rules do not say an image has to be perfect to be a VI. Now about these overexposed areas - I think I see what is being referenced. It’s mostly the left window because when you look at the image on full screen you see the painting and the right window have plenty of contrast and detail. The left window is not relevant to the scope. Now to me this image fulfills all 1-6 of VI criteria. If Lothar Spurzem disagrees he can vote no. That’s his prerogative. I don’t have a dog in this fight between you two. But I don’t see how this isn’t a VI. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you for these soothing words, anger is always bad counselor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)