Commons:Valued image candidates/Peter Sutherland (1985).jpg

Peter Sutherland (1985).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) on 2021-08-18 12:44 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Peter Sutherland, 1985, portrait photography
Used in	Global usage Peter Sutherland
Reason	Best-quality image of Mr Sutherland on the Commons. -- ᴀlbanɢeller (talk)
Review (criteria)	Comment The image is from 1985 its appearance has changed a little since ... it would be good to give the date in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: is it really necessary? ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 18:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)  Comment Simple; for the initial scope you chose this image: Peter-Sutherland-2011.jpg is better. If you want to defend the other then focus the scope with the date. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)  Comment But a single year is arbitrary because we would normally not be able to recognize the difference between a picture of someone in 2011 and 2012. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)  Comment I agree but in this case the two images are too different. Each case is a special case. It is difficult to choose if we slightly modify the scope by adding the year the two images can be promoted and VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)  Comment Understood. But a single year is too short a span to be recognizable. Should we do it by decade? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Scope changed from Peter Sutherland, portrait photography to Peter Sutherland, 1985, portrait photography ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 17:29, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)