User talk:A1Cafel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A1Cafel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Duplicate tagging[edit]

You probably noticed I'm rollbacking some of your edits. You have been warned before to generally tag the newer upload as duplicate. Yet again, I see many of your duplicate taggings are for the older uploads. Pinging @Gbawden. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: Yet some may be mistagged (only a few), many of those are correctly tagged, please look at the time carefully before revert. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
You should look at the time before tagging. (or don't tag at all. or only tag your own uploads) You can't expect me to take a fine comb to this. I checked several, and the older file was tagged. In those cases, I rolled back all your duplicate tagging for that collection. You can undo that if the tagging was actually correct, but too many are not. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
This is becoming a bit annoying . A1Cafel, please start being more careful with your uploads. I don't understand how you upload a file then upload it again, creating a duplicate. Surely you know what you've uploaded? If you need help perhaps someone can create a bot for you. The duplicates just create work for others Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Use VFC[edit]

Hi, kindly use VisualFileChange when tagging files for deletion under the same rationale. Certainly no one wants to have a talk page like this. Thank you. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Karin Kneissl reist nach New York, um an der UN-Generalversammlung teilzunehmen. (30010697567).jpg[edit]

Hi A1Cafel, I've taken the liberty to revert your copyvio-tagging of this image, as 1) BMEIA = Bundesministerium ... and 2) Angelika Lauber is obviously either the regular or a contracted photographer of the BMEIA. The web is full of images with "BMEIA/Angelika Lauber" credit. BMEIA-Flickr-acccount is from 2012, so no doubt to question its credibility. IMO, this case is different from the other tagged images, credited to photonews.at/Georges Schneider, as these have a statement in their EXIF data which indeed seems to contradict their Flickr-licensing. I have directly contacted the Flickr-account BMEIA and asked for clarification; therefore, I've collected all affected images in one DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:AM Kneissl trifft türkischen AM Cavusoglu (39795020775).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

For my files[edit]

@A1Cafel: I see that you nominated several of my files to be deleted. Please, assume good faith. Why would you put the statement "Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work" on it? Sometimes I used my old phone to photograph things (forgot to bring my good one). And I sent it to my Whatsapp on my newer phone. Hence there was no EXIF data on it.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 15:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

For this one. This is a budget for a village in Indonesia. This information thus should be disseminated to the villagers in order for them to know the allocation for their taxes. This should used PD-ID-Gov for the information, and CC-BY-SA-4.0 for the picture.

Facebook images[edit]

Please stop nominating these images for deletion. There's nothing in policy or licensing which states or even implies that Facebook images aren't allowed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Stop nominating valid files for deletion or I'll block your account. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry, it was completely inappropriate of me to threaten you like this. I've been having... temper issues of late. I do believe that you could handle this better, but I was completely out of line. Let me know if you have any questions. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:18, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
No, PLEASE DO STOP! Plus you are not categorizing the deletion noms correctly (or at all), and most don'rt in fact come from Facebook. I hope someone does block you. Johnbod (talk) 09:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
and yet he continues to nominate files from Facebook for deletion despite warnings. @Magog the Ogre: It would be wise to start a VP thread to clarify this. Should we allow files from Facebook without any valid proof of licensing and authorship? Masum Reza📞 12:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
@Masumrezarock100: I agree it would be wise to start a VP thread, since A1C is not listening to reason. I recuse any administrator action against A1C personally. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Puerto Madero (289751554).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Puerto Madero (289751554).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Manifestation à Paris contre la "réforme" des retraites (48789510962).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Manifestation à Paris contre la "réforme" des retraites (48789510962).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

219.78.190.68 02:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Various Files nominated for deletion[edit]

You have nominated numerous photographs that I have posted for deletion. These are photographs of artwork from the Philadelphia Museum of Art (they are medieval works, and are not themselves under copyright); others are features of my place of worship, Church of the Good Shepherd (Rosemont, Pennsylvania). As to the Philadelphia Museum, I have inquired whether it is permissible from the Museum's view that these be posted on Wikipedia. As to the Church, I am at a loss as to what you consider to be necessary. Each of the photographs both from the Museum and the Church were taken personally by me with my cell phone, and then uploaded from my phone to my facebook page, and thence to Wikipedia. I have more than 1,000 revisions or other entries of various kinds on Wikipedia and have never before had images nominated for deletion. I should mention that I have been a lawyer in the US for many years and are very sensitive to copyright issues. If I truly have misunderstood the license system required by Wikipedia, then I wish to get it right. Thanks. Scribley (talk) 01:47, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Scribley: I believe you. It's just that we are extremely wary of any files that originate from Facebook. A lot of people upload images they randomly found on Facebook that they didn't take themselves. We also have the general rule (COM:NETCOPYVIO) that permission should be obtained for anything that was published elsewhere prior to being uploaded here.
There are a few things you could do:
  • Contact OTRS.
  • Upload the original files from your phone, assuming you still have them. You could transfer the photos from your phone to a laptop, or try to upload from the phone directly. Commons:Mobile app might help if you have an Android device. We'd also get much better quality this way!
  • Link your Wikipedia profile on your Facebook account, and give us a link to your Facebook account.
Any of these options should remove all doubt. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments Alexis. I will follow your suggestions for future postings of images I take, and avoid Facebook altogether. Cheers. Scribley (talk) 23:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you've nominated two of my photos for deletion - these were taken by my partner when we were both out taking photos of these buses on their last day of service. I have similar photos from my camera, but hers were better, so I picked them. Of course she's ok with me posting them, she doesn't have a Wiki account, so how do I make this "official", are you suggestion I get her to email you? I honestly don't know what the fuss is about, they're just photos of buses in a public place! Pseudopanax (talk) 23:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

@Pseudopanax: You could send your partner's permission via COM:OTRS. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Solar eclipse 2009-07-22 Chongqing.jpg[edit]

Best regards, --Regasterios (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Hong Kong IMG 2262 (49089782541).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hong Kong IMG 2262 (49089782541).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

File:DSC 3905 (4735100863).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:DSC 3905 (4735100863).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

219.79.96.105 08:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

File:DSC 3923 (4735742836).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:DSC 3923 (4735742836).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

219.79.96.105 08:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

File rename[edit]

Would you mind renaming the file because of #2? I added the description as per the category it is in. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 16:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Eclipse (119758496).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Eclipse (119758496).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

219.78.191.109 02:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Eclipse (119758906).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Eclipse (119758906).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

219.78.191.109 02:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:2017 - Portrait Of Kim Jong-un (37549949744).png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2017 - Portrait Of Kim Jong-un (37549949744).png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

DW photoshop of gov work "North Korea just released a bunch of high-res portraits" Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 12:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Boris Johnson and Sultan Haitham.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Boris Johnson and Sultan Haitham.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Image from Omani News Agency
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

137.189.240.39 07:02, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Deletion requests/File:Carlos Alvarado Debate UCCAEP.jpg[edit]

Hi! I responded on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carlos Alvarado Debate UCCAEP.jpg --MadriCR (talk) 03:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

STOP[edit]

Please stop deleting the WEF licence tag as you did here. --Gindomarlo (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

WARNING[edit]

Please stop doing this in files that have a WEF license. The OTRS ticket is already in the license. --Gindomarlo (talk) 11:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Lunar eclipse January 31 2018 California Alfredo Garcia Jr mideclipse.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lunar eclipse January 31 2018 California Alfredo Garcia Jr mideclipse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

219.79.96.60 02:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)