Commons:Valued image candidates/Rover Mini Cooper 2000 (X411JOP).jpg

Rover Mini Cooper 2000 (X411JOP).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	DeFacto (talk). on 2016-11-19 19:49 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Rover Mini Cooper (X411JOP) - the very last classic Mini
Used in	Global usage en:Mini
Reason	This is the very last classic Mini produced and would complement the VI of the very first Mini. -- DeFacto (talk).
Review (criteria)	Question, @Yann: what was the reasoning behind your change of the scope description and category for this nomination? DeFacto (talk). 21:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC) The link should be to the main category for a given scope, and the scope description is more neutral this way. More information can be given with a {{Info}} here. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC) @Yann: , as the unique and notable feature of this car is not its brand or registration number but that it is the last classic Mini ever - it seems more appropriate to me for that to be its scope. What do you think? DeFacto (talk). 21:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC) As you like, but I would oppose a scope for a single car. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC) I compromised and added the notability of this single vehicle to the scope - I hope that meets with your approval. :) DeFacto (talk). 21:26, 19 November 2016 (UTC) I think this image could match a "Mk VII" scope (AFAIK, I am not an expert on cars). Regards, Yann (talk) 21:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC) Maybe, but I'm not nominating it as the most valued image of a Mk VII (which indeed it might not be) I'm nominating it as the most valued image of the last classic Mini ever produced. DeFacto (talk). 21:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)  Support in this instance, I support the scope of one vehicle. Charles (talk) 21:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)  Support Per Charles. Vehicles like this that're either 1st or last of a certain model or brand of car often en up in museums, so I think this unique scope is OK in this instance. lNeverCry 06:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)