Comment - Nice portrait, but you need to link to Category:Rolf Stommelen instead of Category:c, and since this is the best - and only - portrait of Rolf Strommelen on Commons, I don't think the year it was taken should be included in the scope, though I'm happy to listen to an argument for why it should be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I hope it's OK that I changed the status to discussed, just so that you can resolve these issues, after which I'll be happy to support, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No! I don't understand neither the second category Rolf Stommelen within a category Rolf Stommelen nor your changing the status. But as I said: There are obviously personally reasons. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What the hell is your problem, really? You are so damn prickly! My record is that I support some of your nominations - you never once gave me any credit for successfully arguing on FPC that multiple nominations of cars for FP are just as valid as multiple nominations of church interiors, for example, nor for ANY OTHER SUPPORT VOTE I EVER MADE FOR ANY OF YOUR PHOTOS - yet you take it personally any time I question any photo of yours in the slightest way. I've had about enough of this crap from you. DeFacto is right that technically, I'd have to oppose to make this a discussion, but I thought the idea behind not including the year was that a picture from 1972 would be hard to distinguish from one from 1971 or 1973. However, I understand DeFacto's argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I'm happy with the year in the scope as it leaves room for photos added of other years. (BTW, the VI instructions say to use "status=discussed" when there is at least one "Oppose" vote and one "Support" vote. So as there are only support votes I've changed it to "supported") -- DeFacto (talk). 17:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hell, damn or crap? All are quite mild expletives, and though strictly speaking, four-letter words, so are the words "four" and "word". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
