Yes, it is a cool photo, but the folks over at FPC have very high standards and I doubt it would succeed. I'm no expert photographer, but the fact that the photo was taken from over a mile away from the building tells me that the very picky reviewers over there would find a way to complain about the quality. If you are more experienced than I am, then I would encourage you to nominate this image, as the subject is certainly interesting enough for FP. I'll also ping @Ikan Kekek: for his expert opinion. Also, I'm going to change the scope from "Strata, London" to "Strata, London - Frontal View, since it appears the back of the building looks quite different. Pinging @Buidhe: . —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No objections to change in scope. I have no experience with FPC but this image just seemed to be of high technical proficiency in my (amateur) opinion. Buidhe (talk) 02:26, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is a very good composition, and I might vote for it at FPC, but I'm a little doubtful enough people would consider the subject sharp enough. I'd suggest posting to COM:Photography critiques and asking there whether people thought this could be an FP or not. I don't think people at FPC are necessarily heartless, though I guess that can happen; it's more like, we're opinionated and most of us take seriously the notice that "this is one of the finest pictures" on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
_20.jpg){kind=link}
