Comment Could you try to motivate your nomination a little more? The page it is used on is in Hebrew(?), which I cannot read. The image description says it is an "ancient" light-house in Tel-Aviv. How old is ancient? If I do a Google search using the scope as search criterion, I only get the image page and this nomination as hits, which seems to indicate that the relevance of the scope is too narrow (or that the regional Hebrew name is the one used). Another minor issue: Please format the date field in yyyy-mm-dd form, e.g. 2009-04-03. --Slaunger (talk) 08:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Comment OK, we are getting closer now. I am still confused about the proper spelling of the scope though (which you should also update in the scope field when you change the scope), as we have a Commons category Category:Tel Kudadi without the dash between the two words. A Google search return +100 hits for the Tel Kudadi spelling and 80 hits for the Tel-Kudadi spelling, which seems to indicate for we that the correct spelling is without the dash(?) Once you have figured out what the correct spelling is, you should also link to the Category:Tel Kudadi from the scope field. That makes the life much easier for a VI reviewer as comparative media are then readily at hand. I haven't really started the actual review yet...--Slaunger (talk) 15:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think it is a fairly good illustration of the scope, I am not convinced it is the best though. My main concern is that the left-hand side is basically waste of space. If the image was cropped to focus more on this ancient light-house, I'd be willing to support. --Slaunger (talk) 20:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image is not really illustrative for the scope IMO. The 'ancient' lighthouse is made from concrete and dates from 1934. Tel Kudadi is actually a hill with the remains of a stronghold from the 8th or 9th century BC, and some buildings even dating back to the Iron Age. Lycaon (talk) 21:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
