Commons:Valued image candidates/Thomas Bresson - Punaise mangeant une chenille sur des orties (by).jpg

Thomas Bresson - Punaise mangeant une chenille sur des orties (by).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Tony Wills (talk) on 2009-01-02 10:18 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Picromerus bidens (feeding)
Used in	Global usage de:Baumwanzen, en:Picromerus_bidens, fr:Macrophotographie, sl:Ščitaste stenice
Review (criteria)	(Link to previous reviews)  Comment It appears the reason that this image failed the previous nomination was simply the scope was too broad, the helpful reviewers didn't bother to suggest a suitable scope - so having read some of the many, many directions I have re-nominated with what I think is a suitable scope.  Info Many sheild bugs are vegetarian so a picture of the feeding habits of this species is significant. There appears to only be one other image that could contest for this nomination and that is File:Picromerus_bidens_mit_Beute.jpg which has a few things going for it, but is not as good as this one for illustrating the bugs feeding technique. --Tony Wills (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)  Oppose Not geo-located. Lycaon (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)  Info @Lycaon : It's geolocated. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)  Question Aren't the colours more natural in this version? Other criteria look ok. --Eusebius (talk) 13:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment No. This image is the real scene. -- ComputerHotline (talk) 14:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC) I assume you know better than me. --Eusebius (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)  Support OK for me, provided colours are the natural ones. --Eusebius (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)  Support Since you've geolocated it. --Acarpentier 17:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)  Comment Please add a list where the image is used (not compulsory, but if it is used it is handy). And similarly for all your other noms. Lycaon (talk) 21:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Whose other nom.s? --Tony Wills (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Sorry, that was confusing ;-). This was meant @ComputerHotline of course, but misplaced (and yet proper) here :-P -- Lycaon (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC) ;-). Actually the toolserver was playing up when I originally submitted this so the only usage I could find was the stub article on en:wp which hardly seemed worth mentioning. But it is in fact used in a variety of places. --Tony Wills (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Great! Thanks :-). Lycaon (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Eusebius (talk) 16:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)