Comment - I think I like File:Aarhus Nord Watertower.JPG better. It's smaller, but it's better focused, doesn't look like it's leaning back, and I'm unconvinced the bright light and shadow of the other picture is better than the more restrained light of this one. As for details, sure, you can see individual bricks better in this photo. But otherwise, is there really much that, though smaller, you can't see in the other picture? If the two pictures were otherwise identical, only this was a bigger, closer view, of course it would be more valuable, but the photos aren't identical. Please explain why I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think that because this image also shows the entrance to the water tower and the above relief showing the name "Aarhus Kommune" (Aarhus Municipality) and the year of construction (1907), it is more valuable. In the other image, the view of the entrance is blocked by a light pole. --Bob Collowan (talk) 15:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
