Commons:Valued image candidates/Yellow Tiger Moth Góraszka.JPG

Yellow Tiger Moth Góraszka.JPG

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Wolf (talk) on 2010-08-30 16:19 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: de Havilland Tiger Moth
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Well, it did take some time to browse through all of our images of the Tiger Moth. I believe there are two good images to choose between. This one, obvioulsy, and File:DH 82A Tiger Moth - N81DH.jpg. Each displays some features of the aircraft better, while hiding other features. BTW: this is an FP. -- Wolf (talk)
Review (criteria)	Support Best in scope --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)  Comment I noticed that planes in Category:De Havilland Tiger Moth are sorted in sub-cats with their "personal number". Guessing that it may be sometimes useful for some users, I'd suggest to do the same for this aircraft (T-7230 ?) if that makes sense . --Myrabella (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2010 (UTC)  Comment In my opinion, it is correct scope and best candidate in scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)  Comment I wasn't disputing the scope but only suggesting to refine the categorization :-) --Myrabella (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC) It does make sense, but in a way, it's also pointless, as in: not too practical. You see, in order to make sure I'm not missing on any phenomenal picture of the Tiger Moth, I had to browse through some 20 categories, if I'm not mistaken, and most of them had just one file. While this system of categorizing pictures of planes is essentially a good idea, I think it needs some improvement. Wolf (talk) 22:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Sure, forget the idea then. Anyway I wonder if categories like Category:Aircraft registered in Poland and all its subcategories are really used. I guess they may interest some experts. --Myrabella (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)