Commons talk:Featured pictures/chronological/2013-B

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Set nominated files

[edit]
  • Miya, could you explain what is the "practice" here on dealing with set nominations. It seems the bot not properly placing them here. I closed several nominations when the bot was down. Then I saw someone has removed badly placed sets from these pages.
While closing this, I places only the first picture in "chronological gallery" and just mention it belongs to a 15 picture set (Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological/2013-B#December_2013 #38). Does it the right way, or we need to add all of them. Or it is better to ignore all sets here? Jee 07:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Puck of Pook's Hill, I think no picture is placed in "chronological gallery." Jee 07:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Now I'm checking FP chronological galleries in preparation for POTY 2013, to see whether all the 2013 FPs are included to the POTY gallery (except of the deleted files). At first I was not sure whether I might restore removed set-nominated files, so wrote down the set-nominated files here. But now I support your way to place "only the first picture" in "chronological gallery" and mention it belongs to a set. I'm going to restore August 16 and 19 (I have already restored January 56, February 49, March 47 and 54, April 53). I wonder why Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Puck of Pook's Hill was not added at all... I feel we should restore it, too (to the last of October gallery, perhaps?).--miya (talk) 11:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It seems Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Puck of Pook's Hill was closed by another user (not bot); so he may not sure what to do. Jee 12:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted files

[edit]