File:An analysis of the U.S. Navy verification, validation, and accreditation (VV & A) process for modeling and simulation (M & S) used for operational test (OT) of surface ships and weapons (IA annalysisofusnav109452739).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 772 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 180 pages)
Captions
Summary[edit]
An analysis of the U.S. Navy verification, validation, and accreditation (VV & A) process for modeling and simulation (M & S) used for operational test (OT) of surface ships and weapons ( ) | |
---|---|
Author |
Locke, W. Michael. |
Title |
An analysis of the U.S. Navy verification, validation, and accreditation (VV & A) process for modeling and simulation (M & S) used for operational test (OT) of surface ships and weapons |
Publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
Description |
In this climate of declining budgets and resources, models and simulations (M&S) have become very beneficial to the U.S. Navy. However, the U.S. Navy's investment in, and use of, M&S for addressing critical operational issues (COIs) within a warship's operational test (OT) program would not be practical unless the particular M&S was determined to be a credible representation of that which would be physically tested. Commander Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COMOPTEVFOR) is responsible for accrediting U.S. Navy M&S that are required to support OT. COMOPTEVFOR has developed a VV and A process that is documented in COMOPTEVFORINST 5000.1A. This instruction requires all surface ship acquisition program managers (PMs) to develop a Validation and Verification (V and V) plan that would meet COMOPTEVFOR's expectations for likely accreditation. This thesis will identify the extent to which surface ship PMs are complying with COMOPTEVFORINST 5000.1A; why they are not in full compliance with the instruction; what incentives would help them comply with the instruction; and what improvements can be made to the instruction that would increase compliance by the PMs. Finally, this thesis will conclude with recommendations that would help increase compliance with the instruction by the PMs. Subjects: Armored vessels; Weapons |
Language | English |
Publication date | June 2006 |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
Accession number |
annalysisofusnav109452739 |
Source | |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited |
Licensing[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 13:51, 14 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 180 pages (772 KB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection annalysisofusnav109452739 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #7545) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | michael.locke |
---|---|
Short title |
|
Date and time of digitizing | 20:56, 23 June 2006 |
File change date and time | 00:58, 26 June 2006 |
Date metadata was last modified | 00:58, 26 June 2006 |
Software used | PScript5.dll Version 5.2 |
Conversion program | Acrobat Distiller 5.0 (Windows) |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |