File:Architect and engineer (1920) (14596615598).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,886 × 926 pixels, file size: 1.06 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English:

Identifier: architectenginee6220sanf (find matches)
Title: Architect and engineer
Year: 1905 (1900s)
Authors:
Subjects: Architecture Architecture Architecture Building
Publisher: San Francisco : Architect and Engineer, Inc
Contributing Library: San Francisco Public Library
Digitizing Sponsor: San Francisco Public Library

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
a sound public attitudetoward architecture that work such as that of Messrs. V/oollett & Lambshould prosper and increase at the expense of frankly ill-designed andunstudied building? Why should the shvster be allowed a demonstrableadvantage denied to the reputable practitioner? THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER 49 Alloived, did I say, and denied? One finds himself employing the wordsquite naturally and unconsciously. And yet who should allow or deny tous such personal privileges? Enter the religion of professionalism. Tothe orthodox, investigation concerning the revealed code of professionalethics is as impious as.was inquiry into the nature of the physical uni-verse to the religious orthodox of former days. The code of professionalethics says, Thou shalt not advertise; so we dont. At least we dont call it by that name. We are never found refusingspace and recognition in newspapers. For such service and attentionmost other parties (except criminals and politicians) expect to pay, and -4
Text Appearing After Image:
BRET HARTE HOTEL, GRASS VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.Woollett & Lamb, Architects. do pay, stipulated fees. Our position is peculiar. We need and appreciatenewspaper notices, but the priesthood forbids our paying our own moneyfor them. Therefore, we argue, they should be carried for their newsvalue. The distinction is not in the result, but in the motive and method.A paid notice is advertising, which is illegitimate; the same notice acquiredwithout expense on our part is publicity. No sensitive mind can miss thesuperior distinction of the latter term. But as to that code of professional ethics. What is professional ethics?A divine revelation reposed in the American Institute of Architects? Welive (supposedly) in a rational age; we need not for that reason decry,faith, but we can at least apply reason to the problem. Let us turn to 50

Note About Images

Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Date
Source

https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/14596615598/

Author Internet Archive Book Images
Permission
(Reusing this file)
At the time of upload, the image license was automatically confirmed using the Flickr API. For more information see Flickr API detail.
Volume
InfoField
1920
Flickr tags
InfoField
  • bookid:architectenginee6220sanf
  • bookyear:1905
  • bookdecade:1900
  • bookcentury:1900
  • booksubject:Architecture
  • booksubject:Building
  • bookpublisher:San_Francisco___Architect_and_Engineer__Inc
  • bookcontributor:San_Francisco_Public_Library
  • booksponsor:San_Francisco_Public_Library
  • bookleafnumber:720
  • bookcollection:sanfranciscopubliclibrary
  • bookcollection:americana
Flickr posted date
InfoField
30 July 2014


Licensing[edit]

This image was taken from Flickr's The Commons. The uploading organization may have various reasons for determining that no known copyright restrictions exist, such as:
  1. The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired;
  2. The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions;
  3. The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or
  4. The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.

More information can be found at https://flickr.com/commons/usage/.


Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Internet Archive Book Images at https://flickr.com/photos/126377022@N07/14596615598. It was reviewed on 21 September 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the No known copyright restrictions.

21 September 2015

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current19:27, 21 September 2015Thumbnail for version as of 19:27, 21 September 20151,886 × 926 (1.06 MB) (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{information |description={{en|1=<br> '''Identifier''': architectenginee6220sanf ([https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=Search&search=insource%3A%2Farchitectenginee6220sanf%2F...

There are no pages that use this file.