File:Campaign analysis of a NATO ground forces campaign in Kosovo (IA campaignanalysis00dirk).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,212 × 1,577 pixels, file size: 5.79 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 154 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Campaign analysis of a NATO ground forces campaign in Kosovo   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Dirks, Armin D. W.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
Campaign analysis of a NATO ground forces campaign in Kosovo
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School;Springfield, Va.: Available from National Technical Information Service
Description
Thesis advisors: Lucas, Thomas W. ; Taylor, James G
"June 2000."
Thesis (M.S. in Operations Research)--Naval Postgraduate School, June 2000
Includes bibliographical references (p. 71-74)
On March 24, 1999, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) started an air campaign by attacking targets in Serbia, including Kosovo. This thesis analyzes the question: "What might have happened if Serbia had not retreated and NATO had to conduct a ground forces campaign to achieve its objectives?" The aggregated combat model uses the situational force scoring (SFS) methodology, introduced by RAND, to compute force ratio, attrition, and movement as the result of combat. For a portion of the campaign analysis, the General Campaign Analysis Model (GCAM)(trade name), developed by Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc., is used. It is shown that a NATO ground forces campaign in Kosovo will only be successful, if tactical and technological measures can reduce significantly the defender's use of anti-tank (AT) weapons; even then, the casualties on the attacker's side are relatively high. Furthermore, the developed model is a starting point for the development of a decision support tool for joint continency planning in higher HQ
Mode of access: World Wide Web
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat reader
German Army author
dk/dk cc:9116 9/7/00, updated 1/9/2008 maw

Subjects:
Language en_US
Publication date 1 June 2000
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink; americana
Accession number
campaignanalysis00dirk
Authority file  OCLC: 1041669886
Source
Internet Archive identifier: campaignanalysis00dirk
https://archive.org/download/campaignanalysis00dirk/campaignanalysis00dirk.pdf

Licensing

[edit]
Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current10:36, 15 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 10:36, 15 July 20201,212 × 1,577, 154 pages (5.79 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection campaignanalysis00dirk (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #10841)

Metadata