File:Case study of the United States Marine Corps Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) program test and evaluation strategy (IA casestudyofunite1094513415).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 11.2 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 292 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Case study of the United States Marine Corps Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) program test and evaluation strategy   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Buckles, Brian K.
Title
Case study of the United States Marine Corps Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) program test and evaluation strategy
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
Description

This thesis examined the evolution of the Direct Reporting Program Manager- Advanced Amphibious Assault's test and evaluation strategy from Milestone 0 to the present. The research effort involved reviewing the evolution of amphibious doctrine and amphibious vehicles, reviewing the DoD Acquisition Process and the role of T&E in that Acquisition Process, and analyzing three DRPM-AAA Test and Evaluation Master Plans. Interviews were conducted with personnel from the DRPM-AAA office and General Dynamics Amphibious Systems. Additionally, program documents and acquisition literature were reviewed. An analysis of test and evaluation issues facing the Program Management Office, a determination of the effects those issues had on the program's test strategy, and applicable lessons learned are documented for use by other major defense acquisition programs. Key research findings conclude: that the DRPM-AAA's T&E strategy remained stable and consistent from Milestone 0 to the present as a result of the continuity of the AAAV's Key Performance Parameters; that the DRPM's decision to develop a working relationship that \"actively engages\" both oversight and external agencies early in the test planning process serves in achieving test resource efficiencies; and that the IPT decision-making process differs significantly from the more formal \"staff planning process\" used by most military organizations.


Subjects:
Language English
Publication date December 1999
publication_date QS:P577,+1999-12-00T00:00:00Z/10
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
casestudyofunite1094513415
Source
Internet Archive identifier: casestudyofunite1094513415
https://archive.org/download/casestudyofunite1094513415/casestudyofunite1094513415.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current11:24, 15 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 11:24, 15 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 292 pages (11.2 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection casestudyofunite1094513415 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #10937)

Metadata