File:Reliability of iris recognition as a means of identity verification and future impact on transportation worker identification credential (IA reliabilityofiri109454180).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 1.7 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 148 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Reliability of iris recognition as a means of identity verification and future impact on transportation worker identification credential   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
McLaren, Simon R.
Title
Reliability of iris recognition as a means of identity verification and future impact on transportation worker identification credential
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

The Department of Homeland Security is deploying the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) to U.S. ports to help ensure only authorized individuals having undergone background checks have access to secure areas. Congress mandated the TWIC have a biometric authenticator; DHS chose fingerprints. This thesis argues iris scanning is a better choice because of the nature of the maritime environment and because iris scanning is a more accurate biometric. This thesis also argues there are social factors affecting a biometric-enabled identification card which must be considered for the program to be successful. To investigate the issue of biometrics and the TWIC, this thesis performed a field study of an iris scanner; a survey of biometric attitudes, and interviews with members of the PMA and the ILWU. The iris study operated the scanner in an identification mode, experiencing no false acceptances and few false rejects; however it found the scanner sensitive to sun position with respect to the subject. The pilot study of attitudes found subjects supportive of biometrics in scenarios currently requiring positive identification, but opposing them when it would create new requirements for identification. Both pilot studies were impacted by an inability to provide an incentive to study subjects.


Subjects: Biometric identification; United States; Statistical methods; Ports of entry; Security measures; Harbors; Marine terminals; National security; Technological innovations
Language English
Publication date March 2008
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
reliabilityofiri109454180
Source
Internet Archive identifier: reliabilityofiri109454180
https://archive.org/download/reliabilityofiri109454180/reliabilityofiri109454180.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

Licensing

[edit]
Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current07:35, 24 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 07:35, 24 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 148 pages (1.7 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection reliabilityofiri109454180 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #26402)

Metadata